Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon
- Thread starter kithnou
- Start date
- Status
I don't see why Weinstein would have to write he is a sexual deviant. By many accounts it was well known and accepted with people saying "That's just Harvey Weinstein".
I read everything. I like to verify everything put out there. I watch CNN, Fox, NBC, RT, BBC.
I agree Trump has his flaws, his not a politician like the others. But why do you need to be ?
Bit rich to compare Trump saying what he did with actual actions. That's what people are fed up with.
I read everything. I like to verify everything put out there. I watch CNN, Fox, NBC, RT, BBC.
I agree Trump has his flaws, his not a politician like the others. But why do you need to be ?
Bit rich to compare Trump saying what he did with actual actions. That's what people are fed up with.
Wtf with your criticisms of Ashley Judd??? She has bravely has come forward and her allegations seem to have finally triggered a cascade of other reports that appear to have ended of Weinstein's predatory behaviour. Do you know how hard it is for someone to come forward like that is? As far as I am aware she has never acted in a Polanski movie or signed a petition for him so I can't see any hypocrisy or double standards from her at all yet you seem to be smearing her because she hasn't protested every other sexual pervert that has ever existed???
They exist on both sides of the political aisle, the former Republican speaker of the House has just got out from a jail term for payoffs to boys he admitted sexually abusing not to mention Trump/Ailes/O'Reilly etc, and should be equally condemned. If you want to talk about hypocrisy why don't you explain why you believe Weinstein's accusers and not Trump's?
Where have I said I didn't believe Trump's accusers.
Ashley Judd and Madonna led a march against Trump for what ? Because of some remark. How about her assertion that Ivanka being Trump's favourite sex symbol. What is she suggesting here ?
I get it's difficult to come forth with such allegations. Does that not mean I can't talk about her actions, motives etc on a different matter. After all if the matter is to go to court she'll be subject to a lot more.
As fir Polanski. Judd wasn't part of that petition I agree. But Meryl Streep and Whoopi Goldberg to be more specific to have the audacity to
Ashley Judd and Madonna led a march against Trump for what ? Because of some remark. How about her assertion that Ivanka being Trump's favourite sex symbol. What is she suggesting here ?
I get it's difficult to come forth with such allegations. Does that not mean I can't talk about her actions, motives etc on a different matter. After all if the matter is to go to court she'll be subject to a lot more.
As fir Polanski. Judd wasn't part of that petition I agree. But Meryl Streep and Whoopi Goldberg to be more specific to have the audacity to
Your general comment is pretty abysmal but I just wanted to highlight this little patronising part,insinuating people have a negative view of this guy just because they are blindly following some media agenda.
If I am sitting talking to an idiot I can easily form my own opinion that they are an idiot and would not need to wait for other people to guide me on my opinion on the idiot.
Similarly it would only take a brief skimming over many of Trump's own words and actions, without really needing the media for a person to understandably form a negative opinion on him. That should be clear to you if you are an intelligent person who as they say like to read many sources to get all sides. You personally may not agree with the negative opinion formed, but it's a bit silly to dismiss the general negative vibe around him as just being down to sheep following a media line.
McBain
Player Valuation: £80m
You mean Fox News?
You look like you've bought hook line and sinker into the Fake news scam then that'd probably be all you'd watch.
Which by that you mean all of the main sources of news right? Or the leftist media they are now seen as because the right have an agenda and anyone disagrees is mainstream and fake right?
Even if you look at most European sources who have no affiliation to CNN and MSNBC or NBC or even the "failing" New York Times. Their reporters tend to run similar stories of those called fake by the right in the US
How is it all mainstream media is fake to the right now?
Although there are those with leftist stories they generally report what they see. It could be just that fox and its affiliates plus the right have an agenda whereas the middle centrist media which is mainstream and the left albeit might be inclined to report on the dumb [Poor language removed] the right do are generally reporting real news.
Language
A moron, his own Secretary of State called him a f###ing moron
What's wrong with that ? I usually read the forum as I find it interesting. So you have to post now to have any standing ?
That's kinda life isn't it? You go into a pub and have a debate with people you've known a while and have discussed a whole bunch of things with (including your shared passion of Everton), then that's going to be a whole different debate to one with a complete bunch of strangers. So yeah, get yourself an avatar, post some stuff and settle into the community
Mainly because, to be a politician, you need to be a politician.
To be a doctor, you need to be a doctor. To be a nurse, you need to be a nurse. All of that, for, like, y'know, safety reasons and that, requires training and experience.
So for the safety of the planet, I reckon the President of the USA should be a politician, and not the grade-A idiot that currently holds the position.
I knew we'd catch one
- Status