Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
i probably post here way too much, but this is a mildly interesting conversation:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_..._bauerlein_thinks_now_that_his_candidate.html

My sense from reading and hearing you is that moral relativism and political correctness on college campuses and elsewhere have changed your politics. Things like, say, someone getting up on a college campus and saying America was no better than Putin’s Russia. I assume that would drive you around the bend if a liberal college professor did that. Am I wrong?

Well, I’ve been at meetings when people have talked in the past, like when George W. Bush was elected, about a theocon conspiracy at work. I would say, “Are you delusional?”

OK, but what do you make of the president saying we were no better than Putin’s Russia?

You know, I was traveling.

He has said this several times. Bill O’Reilly called Putin a killer, and Trump said we were no better. You are someone who talks about American greatness.

You know, Isaac, I didn’t see this. I’d love to have seen it.

Did you see his comments at the National Prayer Breakfast, where he made a joke about Arnold Schwarzenegger?

I didn’t see that either. [Laughs.]

You saw what he said about McCain and POWs in the campaign. It just seems like he does the kind of things that would drive you crazy and contradict your theory about American greatness and why Trump is important.

I think it’s part of the unscripted nature of things. When you are under pressure, you are going to say things, and get frustrated. And that’s because you don’t have handlers, you don’t have everything laid out for you. It is not all stage-managed. This is part of the rough-and-tumble. For my sake, I can forgive people a lot of things that they say if I see a base there, a rock bottom, that I support.

One of the problems, Isaac, is that we are living in a society today that is so damn unforgiving. People say dumb things, they make dumb jokes, and we film them and humiliate them and shame them. On college campuses, everyone is frightened to death. My liberal colleagues are scared of saying the wrong things all the time. This to me is a perversion of liberalism. One of the greatnesses of liberalism, the John Stuart Mill liberalism, is that we give people space to say the wrong things sometimes, to think the wrong things, and we allow for human frailty. I am a believer in original sin.

There are people going to bed tonight because they are afraid not of protests on campus against them but because they are afraid of getting deported, or afraid their president hates them, or they are caught in Yemen when their kid is already here. That just bothers me more.

I have faith that the Trump administration, that if it comes in with a blunt hammer and is too sweeping, you will get people stepping in and providing more nuance, more flexibility, and more humanity on the ground. I don’t know the details. I am willing to accept criticism of the immigration issues. The policy maybe needed to be phased in. But I have faith in the administration.

Do you think Trump believes that everyone is the same under the skin, which you have written about as a fundamental value of yours?

I do. This is the Martin Luther King Jr. vision. He is relaxed around all different kinds of people.

If they are celebrities.

No, if you go down to Lower Manhattan and talk to the construction workers down there, they will say they like Trump. He gets us.

I thought you meant people of different races. All of his black friends are celebrities.

So I do think there is a taking everyone on individual merits in personal interactions. And Isaac, if I could tell you how many people I have known who mutter all the right platitudes about diversity and tolerance, and I have seen them treat other human beings in nasty ways.

You talk about why identity politics are bad. Do you now think Trump and Steve Bannon are very consciously practicing identity politics?

I think what has happened here is that identity politics have forced everyone to start thinking in these terms. And I think on the left, you have an alarm: What if white men start playing the game of identity politics the way we have for the past 40 years? That is going to go very badly for everyone.

Was there some point where I fell asleep and white men were no longer, broadly speaking, running the country?

And that is the objection. White men have been playing it all along. Well, let me go through some things. Right now the undergraduate population is close to 60 percent female. Women get more Ph.D.s than men do. Medical school is now half female and half male. Law school now has more women entering.

Joseph Epstein, the conservative essayist, had a piece where he called Obama the first president who didn’t get there on his own merits, as if the first 43 guys, including sons of former presidents, did it all on their own. This idea of besieged white men doesn’t seem like reality to me.

I’ll grant you that point. But let’s come back to identity politics. The Civil Rights Act was an attempt to cancel identity politics. What happened in the implementation and affirmative action was the identity politics. That’s an example of a great liberal reform being put to political uses. If you walk into any admissions office at a selective college, you will see hives of mendacity going on in order to play the identity politics game. Let me ask you, Isaac: Why has identity become such a fixation?

I would tend to blame racism.

OK, why at a time when we have turned racism into the great behavioral sin in our time …

You know who just got elected, right?

But my question is: Why is racism held above greed, wrath, and all the other sins of human beings?

I don’t know the answer. What’s yours?

I am not quite sure about that. I think there are historical issues about the plight of the black community in this country, which is terrible. I think there is a lot of white guilt, liberal guilt, that people try to exorcise in the wrong ways. But to me it’s strange.

We should reconvene in a year and see where things are. I hope they are better than you think. I’m worried and afraid.

I have no idea where we are going to be in a year. I see no lessons from the past that I can apply to the next five years. It’s a whole new historical moment we are in.

(this is just an excerpt.. it goes on and on)
 

raw
 
Joseph Epstein, the conservative essayist, had a piece where he called Obama the first president who didn’t get there on his own merits, as if the first 43 guys, including sons of former presidents, did it all on their own. This idea of besieged white men doesn’t seem like reality to me.

I’ll grant you that point. But let’s come back to identity politics. The Civil Rights Act was an attempt to cancel identity politics. What happened in the implementation and affirmative action was the identity politics. That’s an example of a great liberal reform being put to political uses. If you walk into any admissions office at a selective college, you will see hives of mendacity going on in order to play the identity politics game. Let me ask you, Isaac: Why has identity become such a fixation?

I would tend to blame racism.

OK, why at a time when we have turned racism into the great behavioral sin in our time …

You know who just got elected, right?

But my question is: Why is racism held above greed, wrath, and all the other sins of human beings?

Oh my goodness.
 
So a retailer decides to stop stocking Ivanka Trump products, Trump wades in and complains on Twitter. No conflict of interest to see here folks. None. At. All.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/laurahe...ucts-donald-trump-tweets-unfair/#70fd10832ab5

And now Conway chimes in and tells people to "buy Ivanka's line" in clear violation of Federal Ethics law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2635.702 law there for anyone who cares.



This is from the party that supports the religious and political free speech of companies. They believe that business should have the right to deny medical services to their employees based on the beliefs of company owners. (Hobby Lobby)

Even if Nordstroms made their decision based solely on the political views of their leaders the Republicans have defended their right to do so.

Of course you'd never hear anyone agreeing with them. Republicans are the political equivalent of the RS. "Offended by everything, ashamed of nothing".
 
So a retailer decides to stop stocking Ivanka Trump products, Trump wades in and complains on Twitter. No conflict of interest to see here folks. None. At. All.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/laurahe...ucts-donald-trump-tweets-unfair/#70fd10832ab5


I'm not sure that children should suffer because of the sins of the father. Also his response is how all fathers would respond to anyone taking it out on his daughter. Sometimes the politics need to be put aside and remember that these are real people.......
 
I'm not sure that children should suffer because of the sins of the father. Also his response is how all fathers would respond to anyone taking it out on his daughter. Sometimes the politics need to be put aside and remember that these are real people.......
What about the children of the Nordstrom employees that could lose their jobs due to this oaf and his tweeting?

Don't they count, or is it only the children of the rich that interest you Peter?
 
What about the children of the Nordstrom employees that could lose their jobs due to this oaf and his tweeting?

Don't they count, or is it only the children of the rich that interest you Peter?

I have little interest in the children of the rich, they are well looked after. However I do not like unfairness wherever it appears.....
 
I'm not sure that children should suffer because of the sins of the father. Also his response is how all fathers would respond to anyone taking it out on his daughter. Sometimes the politics need to be put aside and remember that these are real people.......

But Pete. This is the President of the United States of America bleating, and tweeting, that a commercial company has made a decision not to stock products from a company his daughter runs.

I look forward to his condemnation of *random company Trump is not connected to* being tweeted about.

The man is an utter eyesore.
 
But Pete. This is the President of the United States of America bleating, and tweeting, that a commercial company has made a decision not to stock products from a company his daughter runs.

I look forward to his condemnation of *random company Trump is not connected to* being tweeted about.

The man is an utter eyesore.

He may well be. But what of his daughter ? His reaction is the same any father would make if his daughter were picked on. I know it's all relative but we are only human.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top