tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
DOJ prosecutor Jack Smith is one of the only lawyers in America to achieve this EMBARRASSING status…
We often picture our corrupt government elites as cunning masterminds capable of accomplishing anything and executing elaborate schemes. But the reality is quite different. They’re sometimes a bunch of clumsy fools stumbling around in the dark, driven by irrational emotions, and constantly making one mistake after another.
Mr. Smith, whom the left loves to praise as this amazing legal genius, is far from it. The reality is that Mr. Smith is a clumsy overreacher, and he holds the rather embarrassing distinction of being one of the few lawyers in America to have his conviction unanimously overturned by the entire Supreme Court. Yes, every single justice agreed.
Back in 2014, he went after Virginia governor Bob McDonnell and managed to convict him on corruption charges. However, two years later, the whole Supreme Court threw out the conviction, leaving poor Mr. Smith with egg all over his face.
McDonnell was, at the time, considered a major threat to Democrats and a top contender for the presidency. So it’s no wonder Obama unleashed Jack Smith on him.
You know it’s bad when even RBG thought he was off his rocker. Mr. Smith’s conviction was so seriously flawed, that it created an opportunity for numerous other people to pursue justice. This further proves that our elites are not highly-skilled warriors for justice. They are partisan hacks, twisting our laws and policies into pretzels so they can punish their political enemies and gain more power.
For those who would like to know more, that case was about McDonnell getting $135,000 worth of "gifts" from the CEO a pharmaceutical company - in exchange for setting up meetings, hosting parties and calling state officials in order to discuss the pharmaceutical firm's business. He was convicted of wire fraud and taking bribes under official right (ie: he got the gifts because of his role and used his role to get gifts).
The SC threw out the conviction because they held that organizing meetings, having parties and involving state officials wasn't something he did as part of his official role. There was no dispute that he obtained the gifts (indeed he paid most of it back), nor that he had done what he had after getting the gifts - just that getting the gifts in order to do the things he did wasn't corruption because he didn't do it as governor.
As SC decisions go, it is one of the more absurd ones.
