This is a strange edit that you put in @verreauxi s post, which wasn’t in their original post.
View attachment 212583
Haha...wow, what an odd little stooge he is. "gay"...really?
This is a strange edit that you put in @verreauxi s post, which wasn’t in their original post.
View attachment 212583
I think he likes you.Haha...wow, what an odd little stooge he is. "gay"...really?
At least you have a sense of humour... (and embracing your inner LGBQZFXICKT)Haha...wow, what an odd little stooge he is. "gay"...really?
Hope you enjoy your last few moments on here as even though this is an unmoderated part of the forum being openly homophobic doesn’t really go down well you odious little bellend.At least you have a sense of humour... (and embracing your inner LGBQZFXICKT)
I imagine the loaf will be toast soonHaha...wow, what an odd little stooge he is. "gay"...really?
Shame it was just piss trickling down the stairs...Have we all been day drinking with @JimmyJeffers? This got weird fast.
Here, or in that story?Shame it was just piss trickling down the stairs...
Jimmy's story, had the loaf took a tumble, I suspect there'd have been raptures...Here, or in that story?
At least you have a sense of humour... (and embracing your inner LGBQZFXICKT)
I haven't been openly homophobic, my sad little lamb. Nor do you own the forum.Hope you enjoy your last few moments on here as even though this is an unmoderated part of the forum being openly homophobic doesn’t really go down well you odious little bellend.
I never said I control the forum as you would know if you could actually comprehend things. Being homophobic is not political rivalry but I can see why you think it is. Slyly putting “I am gay” into another members post and then doing the hilarious thing of using loads of letters to ridicule people is in fact openly homophobic.I haven't been openly homophobic, my sad little lamb. Nor do you own the forum.
I find this desire to try to control the forum and to remove anyone you perceive as a political rival really weird. For someone that really likes diversity, you sure can't tolerate a diversity of opinion ...
I do hope you're intrigued about these suspicious occurrences or intend to respond to these points @verreauxi since you did dismiss the pipe bomber as being at all important.Haha. You could say you were the Queen of Babylon in a plea agreement. You do know that in a plea agreement a defendant agrees to whatever the prosecution wants in exchange for a favourable sentence? It isn't a statement of fact. It is a statement that the prosecution has demanded.
I read a wide variety of news sources from all over the political spectrum. Unlike you I will never automatically agree with whatever I read.
The reason the pipe bomber is crucial is nicely summed here:
"Recall that Kamala Harris curiously hid the fact that she was in the DNC building on January 6th, and it was only an entire year after the so-called insurrection that the press reported that the Vice President-elect was in the building the morning of the 6th while the pipe bomb was on the premises. Of course, as Vice President elect Kamala Harris enjoyed the protection of the Secret Service, this means that the Secret Service must have conducted a sweep of the DNC building before she entered.
According to Senator Ron Johnson, the Secret Service definitively affirmed that they swept the outside areas of the DNC building adjacent to the entry and exit doors, as well as the parking deck […]
The notion that the Secret Service, the most elite protection detail in the world, swept the DNC building and managed to miss the pipe bomb is impossible to believe—either that or what transpired was such an act of such gross negligence that it is tantamount to deliberate malfeasance. Indeed, as the Google Earth satellite photo reveals, the pipe bomb was mere feet from both the entry and exit doors, as well as the parking garage, where the Secret Service claims it conducted a sweep."
...So how could the pipe bomb have been missed and therefore how could a member of the public have planted it while the secret service was there?
Also
Release the Tape: Revolver Has Definitive Proof FBI Is Hiding Critical Footage of Jan 6 “Pipe Bomber”
Also
Jan 6 Pipe Bomber’s Mechanical Timer Detonates Fedsurrection Lie
Five facts about the pipe bombs are particularly strange, and their significance has never been fully explicated or connected. We will attempt to do so here.
Those five facts are:
1. The pipe bombs — according to the Capitol Police Chief Stephen Sund and Inspector General — were planted as a “diversion” to distract law enforcement shortly before 1 p.m., when the breach of the Capitol’s perimeter was just getting started. According to the official timeline, the breach started just one minute after Capitol Police were informed about the pipe bombs just two to three city blocks away.
2. The pipe bomber used an old-fashioned mechanical timer with a one hour max time setting, but planted the bombs at roughly 8 p.m. the night before January 6 — 17 hours before they were found.
3. The pipe bombs were constructed with no remote detonation ability, meaning their purpose as a diversion relied solely on the “luck” of being found at the right time, between noon and 1 p.m., to match the one-hour timer appearing to target the 1 p.m. Congressional certification vote.
4. The first pipe bomb was found at 12:40 p.m., with 20 minutes left on the timer, perfectly matching the exact timing needed both to “divert” police as the breach began at 12:50 p.m., and to convince police the bomb was timed to the 1 p.m. Congressional vote.
5. The timer didn’t just have 20 minutes left. It was left stuck on the 20 minute dial.
Perhaps you can explain some of these findings or answer some of the strange coincidences. This is why the pipe bomber really matters.
Deary me. lol
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.