Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

[Noisy noise annoys]

Sorry, stop misquoting me. I don't think I've misquoted or strawmanned anyone on this thread yet it's continually done against me. I said that Trump attracts certain parties to him that see him as an easy mark. It happened at least twice during the 16 election when two separate parties(Stormy Daniels and another) successfully bribed him for hush money. I think a number of women have had affairs with him, some not, who then want a pay-off. I'm gonna say the sexual assaults probably didn't happen but I wouldn't defend Trump more strongly than this. Or I'd at least say the chances of these allegations being phoney are fairly high.

I remember when the powers that be tried to get Assange on rape charges. It's the oldest trick in the book.

22 TWENTY TWO twenty two effing times women have wrongly accused him of being a sex pest!?!?!
Seriously!?

You whopper

 

[dylsexicbleu]

I mean...it does mean that

Here's me thinking it meant anything from sexually forward to something more borderline illegal. That's why the term used is 'sex pest' and not a 'sexual assaulter'.

 

[dylsexicbleu]

22 TWENTY TWO twenty two effing times women have wrongly accused him of being a sex pest!?!?!
Seriously!?

You whopper

The vast majority of whom came forward after Trump entered politics. That's probably no coincidence. Folk were coming out of the woodwork in 2016 for bribe/hush money for consensual liaisons. Forgive me if I suspect the others in the post 2016 crowd had an ulterior motive too.

 

[Walken]

Here's me thinking it meant anything from sexually forward to something more borderline illegal. That's why the term used is 'sex pest' and not a 'sexual assaulter'.

I think if you have to bury yourself in semantics, you've essentially surrendered and lost the argument.

You described someone as a sex pest as a defence.

 

[dylsexicbleu]

I think if you have to bury yourself in semantics, you've essentially surrendered and lost the argument.

You described someone as a sex pest as a defence.

Another lie.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

The vast majority of whom came forward after Trump entered politics. That's probably no coincidence. Folk were coming out of the woodwork in 2016 for bribe/hush money for consensual liaisons. Forgive me if I suspect the others in the post 2016 crowd had an ulterior motive too.

So, they’re all making it up?
He’s a racist, sexist thief
And you know it

I can’t wait until his funeral

 

[dylsexicbleu]

So, they’re all making it up?
He’s a racist, sexist thief
And you know it

I can’t wait until his funeral

Yes, they MAY be making it all up. Billionaires in the entertainment and political worlds are kinda susceptible to individuals and their lawyers looking for a cash payday.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Yes, they MAY be making it all up. Billionaires in the entertainment and political worlds are kinda susceptible to individuals and their lawyers looking for a cash payday.

Lol
Youve lost mate
The moment you try blaming 22 victims over one self confessed [Poor language removed] grabber is the moment you’re outed as a tit

 

[roydo]

Yes, they MAY be making it all up. Billionaires in the entertainment and political worlds are kinda susceptible to individuals and their lawyers looking for a cash payday.

Folk dont/cant "make things up" for a pay day mate. There has to be some corroborating evidence and/or circumstance to back an allegation up.

 

[dylsexicbleu]

Folk dont/cant "make things up" for a pay day mate. There has to be some corroborating evidence and/or circumstance to back an allegation up.

Untrue. One of the recent parties in the NY indictment concerns exactly this. Some bloke(there may have been a female involved too I don't know) got a pay-off due to a story he was going to the press with. It appears the story was unfounded but the guy still got something like $30k from Trump/his lawyer or whoever Trump says paid him off. It all occurred during the 2016 campaign. Again, its no coincidence it happened at that time.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Untrue. One of the recent parties in the NY indictment concerns exactly this. Some bloke(there may have been a female involved too I don't know) got a pay-off due to a story he was going to the press with. It appears the story was unfounded but the guy still got something like $30k from Trump/his lawyer or whoever Trump says paid him off. It all occurred during the 2016 campaign. Again, that is no coincidence it happened at that time.

22 times
Lol

 

[roydo]

Untrue. One of the recent parties in the NY indictment concerns exactly this. Some bloke(there may have been a female involved too I don't know) got a pay-off due to a story he was going to the press with. It appears the story was unfounded but the guy still got something like $30k from Trump/his lawyer or whoever Trump says paid him off.

Well Trump is also an idiot then. (Which is hardly news).

Its the oldest legal trick in the book. "How much will it cost me to make this go away?" No honest or innocent person ever needs to say that.

As the saying goes, "You cant con an honest man".

 

[dylsexicbleu]

Well Trump is also an idiot then. (Which is hardly news).

Its the oldest legal trick in the book. "How much will it cost me to make this go away?" No honest or innocent person ever needs to say that.

As the saying goes, "You cant con an honest man".

Yeah, paying someone 30k is a really stupid decision when Trump has his chance of winning the Presidency of the United States at stake. Most presidential campaigns go through 30k in the blink of an eye.

 

[TN Toffee]

How are we even arguing about this? The entire world heard audio of the man not only admitting, but BRAGGING that he is able to get away with sexually assaulting women because he is famous. Case closed.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Yeah, paying someone 30k is a really stupid decision when Trump has his chance of winning the Presidency of the United States at stake. Most presidential campaigns go through 30k in the blink of an eye.

22 times?