Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry mate, I thought you were a Republican for some reason. My apologies.

Fascinating analysis. I had no idea those two agencies were breaking those ways along party lines.

Looking from the outside it appears something just has to give, because I've never seen an incoming president facing questions of legitimacy in my lifetime (as a small kid I can vaguely remember the Nixon furore, but nothing since then has come close, and that was when he was 6 years into his presidency).

I don't know that either agency has any desire for any exercise of removal, but between the media, which by-and-large completely hate him and can't wait for any exposure that will take him out through political or PR methods, and crazies with guns (both of which we have in abundance, with high correlation between the two it seems), I will be surprised if he is still the President in 4 years. Not that I'm hoping for any event, but I don't think he ever wanted to be President, I don't think his ego let him step aside, and I don't think he knows how to proceed in a cautious manner.

All that said, he's as smart as he is untrustworthy, so let's see what happens.
 
I've noticed this narrative sneaking in more and more. Any time a liberal calls it straight they get blamed for the rise of Trump.

- This time 8 years ago McConnell said the obstruction of Obama was to be the primary goal of the House.
- The Tea Party sprung up with the primary objective of obstructing Obama
- Fox news and various radio shows/websites grew massively as good news doesn't sell ad space but outrage does.

The republicans created a monster and in this primary season, completely lost control of him.
There could be an argument that the Democrats did not put up much of a fight but to blame them when they do is ridiculous.

Both sides separated from each other and collaborative efforts, seeking more power from their core bases, not discouraging the emerging polarization, and both have now lost control of their power base. Buckle up and sit down, enjoy the ride.
 
Three American friends conversing on a music forum I frequent:


J: Say if Trump is impeached and convicted, kicked out of office that leaves Pence. Who would you rather have, Pence or Trump?

SG: I'm bitterly opposed to pretty much everything Pence supports and vice-versa, but at least he's playing by the same set of rules the rest of the world is, by which I mean he probably won't get us into a war if his ego takes a hit. He may be a corporatist stooge and a fake Christian of the lowest order, but in a Pence administration I think that we'd at least know what to expect on a day-to-day basis.

SJB: Exactly, he'd be a stooge for the Republican congress, but at least he seems sane. Although women's rights, healthcare, and tax code will go down the shitter. But at least those can be fixed.


Yep, that's about the long and short of it. No use being "anti-elitist" or whatever (as if the Cheeto-faced Billionaire is a man of the people LOL) if you're an utter bell who couldn't be trusted with a bag of gravel and who might press the button in anger just because someone called him a "Half-peeled sweet potato with a spun-gold Brillo-pad toupe."
 
This Russiaphobia is terrifying.

I'm literally shaking. I feel sick.

---

What is it with the Russiaphobia from people?

Well I'd say they're a bigger threat these days than they were in the days they were being described as the 'evil empire' by Ronnie.

I'm just going to assume you were Russiaphobic in the 80s (if you're too young then I bet your dad was). What is it about Putin and his government that you find so trustworthy?
 
Well I'd say they're a bigger threat these days than they were in the days they were being described as the 'evil empire' by Ronnie.

I'm just going to assume you were Russiaphobic in the 80s (if you're too young then I bet your dad was). What is it about Putin and his government that you find so trustworthy?

I was born in 95. I doubt my dad cared to be honest.

I don't particularly see Russia as a threat to the UUK or the USA. I view it as a sovereign nation pursuing national interests.

What threat do they pose in your opinion?
 
Nothing at all to raise an eyebrow at here. Oh no....


Commanding general of D.C. National Guard to be removed from post





Peter Hermann and Aaron C. Davis January 13 at 1:55 PM

The U.S. Army general who heads the D.C. National Guard and is an integral part of overseeing the inauguration said Friday he has been ordered removed from command effective Jan. 20, 12:01 p.m., just as Donald Trump is sworn in as president.

Maj. Gen. Errol R. Schwartz’s departure will come in the midst of the presidential ceremony, classified as a national special security event — and while thousands of his troops are deployed to help protect the nation’s capital during an inauguration he has spent months helping to plan.

“The timing is extremely unusual,” Schwartz said in an interview Friday morning, confirming a memo announcing his ouster that was obtained by The Washington Post. During the inauguration, Schwartz would command not only the members of the D.C. guard but also an additional 5,000 unarmed troops sent in from across the country to help. He also would oversee military air support protecting the nation’s capital during the inauguration.

“My troops will be on the street,” Schwartz, who turned 65 in October, said, “I’ll see them off but I won’t be able to welcome them back to the armory.” He said that he would “never plan to leave a mission in the middle of a battle.”

Schwartz, who was appointed to head the guard by President George W. Bush in 2008, maintained the position through President Obama’s two terms. He said his orders came from the Pentagon but that he doesn’t know who made the decision. It is unclear whether he is part of a larger class of federal workers who have been asked to leave their jobs as a new president takes office.


President-elect Donald Trump will be sworn into office during the 58th inauguration on Jan. 20. Here's a look at what we know about the planned inaugural activities and a look back at how the tradition has evolved. (Claritza Jimenez, Danielle Kunitz, Julio Negron/The Washington Post)
The Army and officials with Trump’s transition team did not immediately respond for comment.

D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) blasted the decision to remove Schwartz, especially on Inauguration Day.

“It doesn’t make sense to can the general in the middle of an active deployment,” Mendelson said. He added that Schwartz’s sudden departure would be a long-term loss for the District. “He’s been really very good at working with the community and my impression was that he was good for the Guard.”

Unlike in states, where the governor appoints the National Guard commander, in the District that duty falls to the president.

Schwartz said that he has not been told why he was asked to step down. “I’m a soldier,” he said, noting that he was following orders and has no regrets. “I’m a presidential appointee, therefore the president has the power to remove me.”

Like other deployments, Inauguration Day will be a complicated one for the D.C. National Guard – at least on paper. Since the District is not a state, its mayor cannot call up Guard members to active duty as a state governor can.

The District must send a letter to the Secretary of the Army requesting the support. The District and the Army must then go through a seven-step process to initiate the deployment, during which Guard members carry out duties at the request of the mayor and city homeland security officials.


INAUGPRESS1011.JPG
Maj. Gen. Errol R. Schwartz, commanding general, D.C. National Guard, during a press conference at the Armory for the upcoming inauguration. (Bill O'Leary/The Washington Post)

The two entities have been able to work together to make that happen quickly in response to unfolding natural disasters, such as last year’s record January snow fall. During that storm, which dumped 22 inches of snow, the Guard was activated in anticipation of the storm’s arrival, and troops helped shuttle officials, plow drivers and supplies back-and-forth across the city.

Schwartz began his military career in 1976 by enlisting in the guard, formally called the Militia of the District of Columbia National Guard. He also oversees the Air National Guard, which combined with the Army guard has an authorized strength of 2,700. He has served in several leadership positions, including commanding the 372nd Military Police Battalion.

He graduated in 1980 from the University of the District of Columbia with a degree in electrical engineering and earned master’s degrees in business management from Central Michigan University and in national security strategy from the National Defense University at Fort McNair, Washington.

Schwartz said that he is most proud of the Youth Challenge Academy, a school for teenage dropouts run by the guard with an infusion of federal money that is separate from both D.C. public and charter schools. It is located at the former Oak Hill facility, the District’s old juvenile jail. He said that about 60 percent of the school’s student body have obtained high school diplomas, and some have gone on to college.

“These are kids with high potential,” Schwartz said. “They just need to be steered a little bit. That’s what guardsmen can do.” He said he has already told his wife that even while retired, he might stay active in the school.

“I don’t mind walking the halls and knocking on doors wearing a suit and tie,” he said.
 
Three American friends conversing on a music forum I frequent:


J: Say if Trump is impeached and convicted, kicked out of office that leaves Pence. Who would you rather have, Pence or Trump?

SG: I'm bitterly opposed to pretty much everything Pence supports and vice-versa, but at least he's playing by the same set of rules the rest of the world is, by which I mean he probably won't get us into a war if his ego takes a hit. He may be a corporatist stooge and a fake Christian of the lowest order, but in a Pence administration I think that we'd at least know what to expect on a day-to-day basis.

SJB: Exactly, he'd be a stooge for the Republican congress, but at least he seems sane. Although women's rights, healthcare, and tax code will go down the shitter. But at least those can be fixed.


Yep, that's about the long and short of it. No use being "anti-elitist" or whatever (as if the Cheeto-faced Billionaire is a man of the people LOL) if you're an utter bell who couldn't be trusted with a bag of gravel and who might press the button in anger just because someone called him a "Half-peeled sweet potato with a spun-gold Brillo-pad toupe."

Yes, but what about pineapple on pizza?
 
Three American friends conversing on a music forum I frequent:


J: Say if Trump is impeached and convicted, kicked out of office that leaves Pence. Who would you rather have, Pence or Trump?

SG: I'm bitterly opposed to pretty much everything Pence supports and vice-versa, but at least he's playing by the same set of rules the rest of the world is, by which I mean he probably won't get us into a war if his ego takes a hit. He may be a corporatist stooge and a fake Christian of the lowest order, but in a Pence administration I think that we'd at least know what to expect on a day-to-day basis.

SJB: Exactly, he'd be a stooge for the Republican congress, but at least he seems sane. Although women's rights, healthcare, and tax code will go down the shitter. But at least those can be fixed.


Yep, that's about the long and short of it. No use being "anti-elitist" or whatever (as if the Cheeto-faced Billionaire is a man of the people LOL) if you're an utter bell who couldn't be trusted with a bag of gravel and who might press the button in anger just because someone called him a "Half-peeled sweet potato with a spun-gold Brillo-pad toupe."

Do you actually believe that he'd nuke a country because of an insult?
 
I was born in 95. I doubt my dad cared to be honest.

I don't particularly see Russia as a threat to the UUK or the USA. I view it as a sovereign nation pursuing national interests.

Is there any reason you don't see them as a threat? Note: I never specified who they were a threat to.
 
Do you actually believe that he'd nuke a country because of an insult?

Probably not (which, in itself, is hardly comforting) but I can easily see him seeing his arse in a way that escalates a minor diplomatic situation into a major, seismic incident. He is a complete div, after all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top