So the Republicans thought the the dnc was gash and The Democrats thought the RNC was gash. Each side think their own wasn’t bad.
Did CNN cut away in the middle of the President of The United States of Americas speech to talk trash about him with Cooper explaining that the president’s speech was “the most recent greatest hits and false statements.” While it’s still ongoing.
That’s a news organisation? Right or wrong isn’t that for us to decide?
In my opinion Trump is a lying right wing baby man.
But that’s pathetic.
And for them to decide what they put on their network?
Exactly. Objective News lollzzzz
TBF reporting on that convention with a ticker running underneath that read “this is the maddest sh**e you will ever see” would have been entirely appropriate.
I suppose we should be thankful that Guilfoyle and Jrs obvious beak habits mean they are less likely to create some form of coke baby.
Calling lies lies IS objective.So the Republicans thought the the dnc was gash and The Democrats thought the RNC was gash. Each side think their own wasn’t bad.
Did CNN cut away in the middle of the President of The United States of Americas speech to talk trash about him with Cooper explaining that the president’s speech was “the most recent greatest hits and false statements.” While it’s still ongoing.
That’s a news organisation? Right or wrong isn’t that for us to decide?
In my opinion Trump is a lying right wing baby man.
But that’s pathetic.
Pretty much exactly this...Wow actually coached her through this and still thought, "Oh, she's good, let's get her on stage front and center"
She looks and sounds like she's channeling Adolf Hitler at the Nuremberg Rallies![]()
Calling lies lies IS objective.
Allowing lies (especially from someone in a position of such power) to air unchallenged/unrefuted is massively irresponsible, and media companies doing exactly that is how we find ourselves in the state we're in.
Had exactly the same problem with Brexit. 99% of economists thought Brexit would be an economic negative (I'll refrain from using the word "disaster", but that's what most thought), but the BBC had 1 pro and 1 against economist on every panel.
Balance for balance's sake is BS.
Pretty much exactly this...
By that logic, if the sky is blue, it isn't objective to say so.Incorrect cutting off a speech and telling people it’s a lie is not objective. Showing the speech and letting people make up their mind is objective
By that logic, if the sky is blue, it isn't objective to say so.
You shouldn't tell people that, matey, it's biased. You should let people make up their own mind. Though you might not like the impression they get.If Trump was doing a speech on the sky and they cut it off and told the viewers ‘it’s all lies.’ Even though he went on for an hour about the sky some of it was ill informed, some was true and some was subjective. Even on the perceived lies from CNN your audience has to make their own mind up.
Even though trump lied in my opinion, just like any other president granted much craper lies and more frequentlyof what he said is true and a big proportion was subjective.
They always cut him off and it’s for their own agenda. It’s not News. Sure if you go onto YouTube half the time they cut him off over the years is the moment he starts trashing CNN. And when he is telling the truth about them. Or at least being subjective about them.
But it wasn’t objective journalism what they do or what they did for the RNC speech.
And you know I don’t like Trump if I had my way I wouldn’t have him cut off the air I’d have him pulled out of office by the scruff of the neck and abolish that system.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.