Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Barry Rathbone said:
Some info about head honcho spokesman and unwitting patsy for man made climate doom Pres Obama.

In spite of his earnest concerns and speeches about "dangerous man made climate change" including rising sea levels he has bought a mansion near the sea at Martha's Vineyard :eek::eek:

View attachment 75073
Click to expand...
That's got to be one of the dumber "cases" I can recall.
 
verreauxi said:
Really clamoring for more attention. I guess all those "name" climate scientists that he asked for peer reviewed papers from didn't give him enough (Spoiler: he never asked them). But I am wowed by the logic of the following: Obama bought a house on Martha's Vinyard so therefore climate change is a hoax. Top-shelf logic again from Mr. Smarter-than-science.
Click to expand...


Yep, that Obama meme is undeniable peer-reviewed empirical evidence. We're finished, let's face it
 
verreauxi said:
Really clamoring for more attention. I guess all those "name" climate scientists that he asked for peer reviewed papers from didn't give him enough (Spoiler: he never asked them). But I am wowed by the logic of the following: Obama bought a house on Martha's Vinyard so therefore climate change is a hoax. Top-shelf logic again from Mr. Smarter-than-science.
Click to expand...
All you and the plethora of believers have to do is supply the non computer modelled peer review paper as requested but you keep failing to do so the conclusion is inescapable - you have no robust science for man made climate danger.

It is a very simple "put up or shut up" scenario. The top PR advocate for the entire canard, ex Pres Obama, told everyone he wasn't a scientist but happily relied on official agency scientists who convinced him how dreadful it all was. His declaration was a devastating warning and identifier of causation “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” He doubled down on the message advertising he regularly received charts and papers from his agency scientists demonstrating the case. Only fair skeptics ask "is it that modelled guff, lad? Because you do Know they're not facts"

So there you have it my obfuscating little chipmunk either you have non modelled peer reviewed evidence or you don't, it really is that simple.

So let me cut you a deal either "put up or shut up" and supply the requisite paper OR post a youtube vid of you singing an Elvis number in full jumpsuit to entertain me.

I'm really hoping it's the latter given no such peer reviewed evidence exists but I suspect obfuscation will emanate from your orifice like Malvern spring water cascading loudly and proudly after heavy rain. I hope obfuscation doesn't figure because it is so juvenile and ineffective not to mention boring because believe it or not I have enjoyed your pseudo science attempts and would genuinely hate to put you in the buffoon box titled "ignore"
 
Barry Rathbone said:
All you and the plethora of believers have to do is supply the non computer modelled peer review paper as requested but you keep failing to do so the conclusion is inescapable - you have no robust science for man made climate danger.

It is a very simple "put up or shut up" scenario. The top PR advocate for the entire canard, ex Pres Obama, told everyone he wasn't a scientist but happily relied on official agency scientists who convinced him how dreadful it all was. His declaration was a devastating warning and identifier of causation “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” He doubled down on the message advertising he regularly received charts and papers from his agency scientists demonstrating the case. Only fair skeptics ask "is it that modelled guff, lad? Because you do Know they're not facts"

So there you have it my obfuscating little chipmunk either you have non modelled peer reviewed evidence or you don't, it really is that simple.

So let me cut you a deal either "put up or shut up" and supply the requisite paper OR post a youtube vid of you singing an Elvis number in full jumpsuit to entertain me.

I'm really hoping it's the latter given no such peer reviewed evidence exists but I suspect obfuscation will emanate from your orifice like Malvern spring water cascading loudly and proudly after heavy rain. I hope obfuscation doesn't figure because it is so juvenile and ineffective not to mention boring because believe it or not I have enjoyed your pseudo science attempts and would genuinely hate to put you in the buffoon box titled "ignore"
Click to expand...
This is like viewing an experiament to prove the dunning Kruger effect, what a bizarre fellow. at least the people who fund the propaganda you love have a clear financial reason, however evil that makes them
 
Barry Rathbone said:
I'm really hoping it's the latter given no such peer reviewed evidence exists but I suspect obfuscation will emanate from your orifice like Malvern spring water cascading loudly and proudly after heavy rain. I hope obfuscation doesn't figure because it is so juvenile and ineffective not to mention boring because believe it or not I have enjoyed your pseudo science attempts and would genuinely hate to put you in the buffoon box titled "ignore"
Click to expand...


Oh man Baz, I wonder how many times you had to visit thesaurus.com to put this one together. We've been the ones posting peer-reviewed papers, so far you have posted articles from whatsupwiththat.com (a site run by a guy who isn't even a scientist as it turns out) and an Obama meme. Simone Biles would gaze upon your mental gymnastics in awe
 
Barry Rathbone said:
All you and the plethora of believers have to do is supply the non computer modelled peer review paper as requested but you keep failing to do so the conclusion is inescapable - you have no robust science for man made climate danger.

It is a very simple "put up or shut up" scenario. The top PR advocate for the entire canard, ex Pres Obama, told everyone he wasn't a scientist but happily relied on official agency scientists who convinced him how dreadful it all was. His declaration was a devastating warning and identifier of causation “Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” He doubled down on the message advertising he regularly received charts and papers from his agency scientists demonstrating the case. Only fair skeptics ask "is it that modelled guff, lad? Because you do Know they're not facts"

So there you have it my obfuscating little chipmunk either you have non modelled peer reviewed evidence or you don't, it really is that simple.

So let me cut you a deal either "put up or shut up" and supply the requisite paper OR post a youtube vid of you singing an Elvis number in full jumpsuit to entertain me.

I'm really hoping it's the latter given no such peer reviewed evidence exists but I suspect obfuscation will emanate from your orifice like Malvern spring water cascading loudly and proudly after heavy rain. I hope obfuscation doesn't figure because it is so juvenile and ineffective not to mention boring because believe it or not I have enjoyed your pseudo science attempts and would genuinely hate to put you in the buffoon box titled "ignore"
Click to expand...
You make it sound like there is actual peer reviewed scientific journals that prove man made climate change is fiction. Just to save me sifting though every page, given that the thread is almost 2000 pages long, can you tell me what page you linked it on?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top