Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Incredible witch hunt when one of the witches admits to being a witch.
Mueller has a full coven of witches’ plea deals at this point.

Giuliani’s statements are lol
Giuliani in first statement after Manafort plea deal:
"the President did nothing wrong and Paul Manafort will tell the truth.”

Giuliani in revised statement after Manafort plea deal:
"the President did nothing wrong."
 
So the GOP were lambasting Feinstein for sitting on the Kavanaugh sexual assault letter but in the mean time they've been prepping a defense, they knew the letter was there all along. Their defense consists of 'here's a list of women he didn't assault'
 
So the GOP were lambasting Feinstein for sitting on the Kavanaugh sexual assault letter but in the mean time they've been prepping a defense, they knew the letter was there all along. Their defense consists of 'here's a list of women he didn't assault'

He went to an all boys school...how on earth did he know 65 girls well enough for them to be prepared to sign onto a letter like this?
Edit apparently this was created within a short time but am still amazed he knew this many let alone they would be character witnesses
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...naugh-allegations-women-letter-chuck-grassley
 
Last edited:
Here is my question: If there really was (is) something of substance to this, why didn't Feinstein turn it over to the FBI in July/early August? Instead of "I've got something from someone I can't identify about a subject I can't tell you about, and you can't see it, but I gave it to the FBI" on September 12th?

Let's say every word is true, and it's something that disqualifies him (politically or legally). There have been hundreds if not thousands of hours of senators, congressmen, aides, security etc....wasted on hearings for ...what? Political theater?
 
Here is my question: If there really was (is) something of substance to this, why didn't Feinstein turn it over to the FBI in July/early August? Instead of "I've got something from someone I can't identify about a subject I can't tell you about, and you can't see it, but I gave it to the FBI" on September 12th?

Let's say every word is true, and it's something that disqualifies him (politically or legally). There have been hundreds if not thousands of hours of senators, congressmen, aides, security etc....wasted on hearings for ...what? Political theater?
I get the feeling from the Ronan Farrow piece that Feinstein was trying to walk a bit of a tightrope - trying to honor the woman’s request for privacy whilst trying to verify if there was anything to it. And then other dems, who prefer the more Trump like confrontational approach, wanted to leak it all at which point she punted to the FBI.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news...ugh-stirs-tension-among-democrats-in-congress
The letter was also sent to the office of Senator Dianne Feinstein. As the ranking minority member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Feinstein was preparing to lead Democratic questioning of Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing weeks later. The woman contacted Feinstein’s office directly, according to multiple sources. After the interactions with Eshoo’s and Feinstein’s offices, the woman decided not to speak about the matter publicly. She had repeatedly reported the allegation to members of Congress and, watching Kavanaugh move toward what looked like an increasingly assured confirmation, she decided to end her effort to come forward, a source close to the woman said. Feinstein’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

Feinstein’s decision to handle the matter in her own office, without notifying other members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, stirred concern among her Democratic colleagues. For several days, Feinstein declined requests from other Democrats on the Judiciary Committee to share the woman’s letter and other relevant communications. A source familiar with the committee’s activities said that Feinstein’s staff initially conveyed to other Democratic members’ offices that the incident was too distant in the past to merit public discussion, and that Feinstein had “taken care of it.” On Wednesday, after media inquiries to the Democratic members multiplied, and concern among congressional colleagues increased, Feinstein agreed to brief the other Democrats on the committee, with no staff present.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top