Really?
I don't get how this affects anything really considering how many contradictions and disagreements are on this forum alone everyday.
The only thing that really matters imo is does he bring something to the team and are we better off keeping him or losing him for nothing?
I'm coming from a place that he's defo off, mate. He's had a long time to sign, but the same concerns are still there, injury prone, still not a convincing finisher.
What would it cost in wages to keep him? Is he worth 100k a week for example?
If we re-sign him, is anyone realistically going to sign him for a fee next summer?
Should we linger on not getting a fee for him when he only cost us 1.5 mil?
Despite the fact he is clearly a better footballer than Beto, is Beto just a more effective striker?
Is it in a way, rewarding failure, by offering him a new deal? Is that fair to Beto who has shown himself to at least be a decent forward in this league?
For me, I would rather wish him good luck, and sign someone to give Beto some competition next season.
He's been at the club for the best part of a decade, he has been more than great value for money. At times, he looked like a real player, other times not so much. He has been very unfortunate with injuries, but I personally don't want a sick note. I honestly feel you could get just as effective a striker as DCL for less than 20 mil.