To everyone saying we should've addressed the striker problem, we actually did!
We bought Maupay!
I suspect the club knew what money was available and they took a chance on him. His past record was okay for the money spent so it was presumed he would chip in with a few goals.
Playing him in formations that did not suit his game and being lambasted by our fans has destroyed his confidence.
Please remember that after his first game here he was universally praised because the fans could see the team had better balance.
I guess, but at the same token it's doesn't take hindsight to critique that as inadequate. I thought it was poor at the time.
His goal rate was never really the basis of his game, Factor the teams schemes its not as if that was a like replacement for Dom. I think the basis was to have a different option stylistically, when really they should have gotten more insurance that overlapped with Dom assuming likely absences and how predicated the schemes were on his availability.
And regardless of fit I think the calculation was poor. Maupay at 26, its not like there was a lot in relation to growth or ceiling in the deal. In the inverse if it was for present EPL chops he wasn't really a goal getter striker to begin with. And for a reported 15 million, the club could have searched Europe and I think muster a deal for something with more rationale.
We can say they got cover, its then a critique of just terrible recruitment.