2023/24 Dele

Again you have missed the subtle point. It is not illegal to posses, however if you posses for psychoactive purposes then it is. That means what you have quoted can be true and what I am saying is true.


From your document:



Funny how quoted 1.7 and 1.8 🤣 let’s see what 1.9 says:

“1.9. To note, in this report we refer to use of nitrous oxide for its psychoactive effects as ‘non-legitimate use’.”


Anyway let’s assume what you are saying is true, it’s still an illegal drug. And is not something you would ever see a professional like say Gareth Barry doing what Dele is doing.

As for the daily mail, 🤣 back to your Guardian echo chamber.
That report is just a harms assessment and not the legislation. 1.7 and 1.8 are them stating what the law is. 1.9 is the report writers clarifying that for the purposes of the report, they are going to refer to use of nitrous oxide for its psychoactive effects as ‘non-legitimate use’.”

Again, basic comprehension skills.
 
There is an implied term in mass debating. Notice I’m not taking part in it. Winkers
You like saying 'implied term'. Express term too when discussing the Legislative Act earlier
Both terms are more of a contract law thing, but anyway this here is not an implied term, it is more a mixture of innuendo and homophone. And sure, you don't partake lol

So are you going to admit you were wrong about the Nitrous Oxide being illegal to possess or are you going to ignore it?
You know, having thrown insults at people here even though you were wrong and were told countless times
 
Again you have missed the subtle point. It is not illegal to posses, however if you posses for psychoactive purposes then it is. That means what you have quoted can be true and what I am saying is true.


From your document:



Funny how quoted 1.7 and 1.8 🤣 let’s see what 1.9 says:

“1.9. To note, in this report we refer to use of nitrous oxide for its psychoactive effects as ‘non-legitimate use’.”


Anyway let’s assume what you are saying is true, it’s still an illegal drug. And is not something you would ever see a professional like say Gareth Barry doing what Dele is doing.

As for the daily mail, 🤣 back to your Guardian echo chamber.
Didn’t Gareth Barry steal a taxi while hammered at West Brom? Not very professional that is it?
 
Oh, and going back to the first link you shared as evidence: https://www.abbeycarefoundation.com/hippy-crack-faq/

It literally states in that link that you were using as evidence to it being illegal:
In addition, possession of Nitrous Oxide/Hippy Crack is not illegal

But possessing it with intent to sell it as a (party) drug is illegal.

The line where it states it is illegal to use for recreational purposes (which they do twice) is reinforced by referencing a BBC news article.
Which is here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-46591871

That BBC news article, does not once state it is illegal for possession or personal consumption, it is all about the governance of supply, despite the website using it as a reference for their evidence.

So maybe you should try reading things.

BBC article from 2 days ago. Possession is currently not illegal but supply is. It will be illegal. But at this point isn’t. And the ban goes against advice from the drugs advisory board anyway.

Dele he literally been pictured once using a non illegal substance. No evidence he has ever done it again or does it regularly.
You are wrong, accept it and move on.
...and mic drop lol
 

Again you have missed the subtle point. It is not illegal to posses, however if you posses for psychoactive purposes then it is. That means what you have quoted can be true and what I am saying is true.


From your document:



Funny how quoted 1.7 and 1.8 🤣 let’s see what 1.9 says:

“1.9. To note, in this report we refer to use of nitrous oxide for its psychoactive effects as ‘non-legitimate use’.”


Anyway let’s assume what you are saying is true, it’s still an illegal drug. And is not something you would ever see a professional like say Gareth Barry doing what Dele is doing.

As for the daily mail, 🤣 back to your Guardian echo chamber.

Nope. Again, read the PSA - nowhere does it refer to POSESSION except with intent to supply (or in a custodial setting) for psychoactive effects.

Once more for those at the back: USE OF NITROUS OXIDE FOR PSYCHOACTIVE EFFECTS IS NOT ILLEGAL.
 
That report is just a harms assessment and not the legislation. 1.7 and 1.8 are them stating what the law is. 1.9 is the report writers clarifying that for the purposes of the report, they are going to refer to use of nitrous oxide for its psychoactive effects as ‘non-legitimate use’.”

Again, basic comprehension skills.
The act has implications like all law, even if it is not explicitly stated which it is all over the actual act on parliament. The main provision of the act is supply, doesn’t mean it doesn’t cover other things as stated.

Dele had illegal drugs fact. You can debate the ins and outs of how illegal, the fact remains.

No point debating ideologically minded people who refuse to believe evidence.


1694172617306.png
 
Yeah of course you’d rather have money than not, that just goes without saying. But that’s different to arguing that money literally equals happiness. There are some situations in life that no amount of money could ever fix.
Money, or rather lots of it, is not the Utopia most believe it is.

In my previous professional life I dealt with dozens of lottery winners. Everybody handles becoming instantly wealthy differently, but in my experience excessive wealth causes more problems than it solves. Much more.
 
The act has implications like all law, even if it is not explicitly stated which it is all over the actual act on parliament. The main provision of the act is supply, doesn’t mean it doesn’t cover other things as stated. Dele had illegal drugs fact.

No point debating ideologically minded people who refuse to believe evidence.


View attachment 226642

That is under the section on importing and exporting. So unless you know that Dele brought the Nitrous Oxide in across a border....
 
The act has implications like all law, even if it is not explicitly stated which it is all over the actual act on parliament. The main provision of the act is supply, doesn’t mean it doesn’t cover other things as stated.

Dele had illegal drugs fact. You can debate the ins and outs of how illegal, the fact remains.

No point debating ideologically minded people who refuse to believe evidence.


View attachment 226642
This is tiresome
You are pointing out legislation governing the possession of a class of drugs that Nitrous oxide is yet to be raised to
You yourself said it will become Class C
It cannot be illegal and not illegal at the same time
The law does not act retroactively so therefore Dele has not done anything illegal

Do you not understand how time works?
 


Top