Fair enough, I was wrong to use the word emotional. I will leave it at agenda driven, as the post I was referring to was on the agenda driven side of things.
I am just more level headed, about football in general, than I used to be, that warped my wording into what I put. I was more or less over the game within half an hour, went for a walk on a beautiful day and all was good with the world.
But again, you don't judge a manager on 2 games a season. If it was the other way around and he had that record against every other team but had a great record against Liverpool, would you definitely be saying he should not be sacked, despite more than likely finishing just above the relegation zoine every season and/or more than likely eventually getting relegated. This is my point, lucky not to be sacked for one poor record against local rivals is not a constructive argument to be had.
We need to step back and look at his whole performance, if you still think he has been extremely poor then fair enough, I would disagree but at least the argument would be more logical, as to why he should or shouldn't be/have been sacked.