I bet Jelavic put a cocktail sausage in Fellaini's Appletini didn't he.
Sounds painful
I bet Jelavic put a cocktail sausage in Fellaini's Appletini didn't he.
What confuses me more is why we always have to play with one striker up front.
Why not Jelavic and Anichebe up front, Fellaini and Osman/Gibson in the middle.
How does that sound?
Total disagreement with many of the points here, by far his best postition is in the hole - he doesnt even play there in the conventional sense. Is everyone barking.
Get Charlie Adams in!
Still makes me laugh the other week when people had selective memory about his midfield ability.
My sole point about that was that if we were going to move him back into midfield to replace our current duo (which I think we should do) is that it would be a Neville-Fellaini partnership you'd be getting rather than an Osman-Fellaini one.
I stand by that. Fellaini doesn't and never has played the role Neville does.
Neville doesn't have a role, he just fills space. Like a Mancunian traffic cone.
That said, when Neville dropped to right back against Southampton, Fellaini was the direct replacement for a reason.
He wasn't though. Osman played behind Fellaini.
Central midfield is probably the most important of the pitch. Even if moving Fellaini back in to midfield means weakening our strikeforce then so be it. Fellani & Gibson need to start controlling the middle again and the rest will fall in to place wit the players we've got. I just hope Moyes sees this.
	Not really, it's just that Fellaini's game was box to box, Osman remained the static "playmaker" (even though he did none of that at all against Southampton unfortunately) on the halfway line. So Felli was both behind and ahead of Osman depending on the phase of play.
Ultimately, that was a Fellaini/Osman partnership and we looked a lot better when we reverted to that.
[/FONT][/COLOR]
http://www.evertonfc.com/news/archive/2012/05/30/-felli-can-be-new-cahill
[video=youtube;oKI-tD0L18A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKI-tD0L18A[/video]