Current Affairs Culture wars & The rise of grifting

Status
Not open for further replies.
The science is well founded. The reaction of politicians driven by capitalist with their sunken costs in a fossil fuel world sucks big time. Their ‘get out’ politically is support by morons.

And elections every 5 years meaning they have no incentive to think any further than that. Apart from their kids lives but, y'know, they're politicians for a reason.
 
Im giving the benefit of the doubt. He was suggesting he wants a civil debate and adult conversation. So far today, when presented with one, he seems to have thrown his dummy out the pram.
You are wasting your time as he has no ability to deal with counter-information. He posted two videos from London suggesting they show different things. One was from Sky News and the other--don't laugh--was from "Kevin Agastra." This isn't "a debate" in any sense of the word. And I'm not "pretending" to ignore him, I'm just ignoring him as it's pointless to have a debate with someone who thinks their evidence is a youtube video posted by Kevin Agastra. But I give you high marks for trying!


Apart from the London data that I posted earlier which clearly show no two-tiered policing, a FOI request asked of the Met Police reveals the following:

1663864015454.png
1663864036694.png
But numbers, evidence, and a preponderance of data obviously don't matter when you engage in ferocious, knife-to-the-heart debate tactics such as "with all due disrespect i don`t have to give you evidence" and "I'll never change my mind about official/establishment "Climate warming" and bizarrely "i`ve been very aware of and involved with the natural world for decades and the "official" line is bogus, i wholeheartedly know it and that`s why my conviction is unshakeable."

I mean, why bother to engage with this? He isn't going to engage in the numbers I posted, which clearly show that there isn't some sort of free pass being given to BLM protesters by the met police. This is why I ignore him and why his only rebuttal is dumb puns on my moniker and to puzzlingly call me a narcissist, as if self-vanity has anything to do with climate change, BLM protests, or anti-lockdown measures--all things he can't sensibly discuss in any adult fashion.
 
You are wasting your time as he has no ability to deal with counter-information. He posted two videos from London suggesting they show different things. One was from Sky News and the other--don't laugh--was from "Kevin Agastra." This isn't "a debate" in any sense of the word. And I'm not "pretending" to ignore him, I'm just ignoring him as it's pointless to have a debate with someone who thinks their evidence is a youtube video posted by Kevin Agastra. But I give you high marks for trying!

I mean, why bother to engage with this? He isn't going to engage in the numbers I posted, which clearly show that there isn't some sort of free pass being given to BLM protesters by the met police. This is why I ignore him and why his only rebuttal is dumb puns on my moniker and to puzzlingly call me a narcissist, as if self-vanity has anything to do with climate change, BLM protests, or anti-lockdown measures--all things he can't sensibly discuss in any adult fashion.
You have repeatedly resorted to an ad hominem style of reply to me, including mentioning "therapy" so i have thrown it back at you, deal with it.
Narcissism isn`t just vanity but you get points for lying by omission so, well done.
You continually post as a narcissist would, even to the extent of telling Jebus-lives that he is "wasting his time" "don`t bother with him" etc. Then to exonerate yourself you give reasons/excuses why he should to portray yourself as the victim. I bet he`ll be elated you gave him "high marks" ??? How marvellous you.
Do you think members need you to tell them who they should engage with? No need to answer because in your own mind you do think it`s what they need.
A week ago you whined and belly-ached that i was obsessed with you but you haven`t left me alone since. You are transparent.
 
the-simpsons-homer.gif
 
So how about those inconvenient numbers that don't match the dumb right-wing narrative you are trying to push, eh?
Straight away- Q2- Are officers formally or otherwise instructed to take the knee or ignore BLM violence or vandalism?
The Official answer- NO.
The police may not have been ordered to take the knee etc. etc. but there`s footage all over the place of them doing exactly that.
Have you posted that as a joke or wind-up? You do realise it negates your argument from the onset, don`t you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top