Current Affairs Culture wars & The rise of grifting

Status
Not open for further replies.
for starters- why the need for so much ad-hominem waffle?

you say you`re impatient/bored but take all that time kaking up the already backed up sewer of rubbish you call a post

you`re a "scientist" ? - shut the front door- but but but- you`ve given me too much to work with here.

anyway- i`m an observer and i`ve noticed some stuff- firstly lets get that inconvenient fly out of your ointment - the empty planes-

on page 102 - time 9.00 you posted "no matter what evidence you are faced with"

i replied at 9.16 "what evidence?" then continued answering with the "carbon trading" and "empty planes"

for some reason you have stated it was "another poster" i was talking to (as if that ever mattered)

i think "carbon trading" and "empty planes" are valid points to bring up when the general public are being told to limit their car journeys.

now the bit in bold- you (and @Pretender17) will carry on stinking the place out with your presence while pretending you`re ignoring me-
if you can`t answer my questions just say so - running away looks bad and is so undignified. (just say you`re bored, no one will notice)

are you really a scientist? really? even though you come across as a fly-swat salesman can i call you Prof.?

edit- sorry but i still haven`t read all of your post
Mad that you think this makes you sound in any way cool/right/sane.

The entirety of that inane waffle contained precisely one capital letter, yet you see fit to attack somebody else’s academic credentials?
 
for starters- why the need for so much ad-hominem waffle?

you say you`re impatient/bored but take all that time kaking up the already backed up sewer of rubbish you call a post

you`re a "scientist" ? - shut the front door- but but but- you`ve given me too much to work with here.

anyway- i`m an observer and i`ve noticed some stuff- firstly lets get that inconvenient fly out of your ointment - the empty planes-

on page 102 - time 9.00 you posted "no matter what evidence you are faced with"

i replied at 9.16 "what evidence?" then continued answering with the "carbon trading" and "empty planes"

for some reason you have stated it was "another poster" i was talking to (as if that ever mattered)

i think "carbon trading" and "empty planes" are valid points to bring up when the general public are being told to limit their car journeys.

now the bit in bold- you (and @Pretender17) will carry on stinking the place out with your presence while pretending you`re ignoring me-
if you can`t answer my questions just say so - running away looks bad and is so undignified. (just say you`re bored, no one will notice)

are you really a scientist? really? even though you come across as a fly-swat salesman can i call you Prof.?

edit- sorry but i still haven`t read all of your post
Mr. Oddball, what you’ve just written is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone on this forum is now dumber for having read to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
 
Mad that you think this makes you sound in any way cool/right/sane.

The entirety of that inane waffle contained precisely one capital letter, yet you see fit to attack somebody else’s academic credentials?
if the grammar police get on to me we`ll all know it was you who snitched.

i mocked @verreauxi because "science" is in its infancy- especially "Global Heating" science and he`s reckoning its the be-all and end-all which it is far from.

the papers he links are all full of scientific jargon that doesn`t wash with me and he can`t/won`t even explain or acknowledge Earth cycles or unnecessary co2 emissions.
 
if the grammar police get on to me we`ll all know it was you who snitched.

i mocked @verreauxi because "science" is in its infancy- especially "Global Heating" science and he`s reckoning its the be-all and end-all which it is far from.

the papers he links are all full of scientific jargon that doesn`t wash with me and he can`t/won`t even explain or acknowledge Earth cycles or unnecessary co2 emissions.
You had a wobble earlier but I think you’re getting back on track.

This is actually quite enjoyable WUM work.
 
You had a wobble earlier but I think you’re getting back on track.

This is actually quite enjoyable WUM work.
maybe so - its quite difficult replying to all the fan-mail i get so sometimes they might come over a bit cobbled, i`m sure they appreciate the efforts i make in getting back to them though.

i hope you didn`t drive over, its a lot better for the environment if you come by plane-

some very clever science guys have apparently discovered that high-octane jet fuel is good for you, unlike that nasty diesel/petrol stuff in your car
 
maybe so - its quite difficult replying to all the fan-mail i get so sometimes they might come over a bit cobbled, i`m sure they appreciate the efforts i make in getting back to them though.

i hope you didn`t drive over, its a lot better for the environment if you come by plane-

some very clever science guys have apparently discovered that high-octane jet fuel is good for you, unlike that nasty diesel/petrol stuff in your car
Nah, you’ve lost it again.

Less is more, amigo.
 
What I suspect happens is that throughout the day, you spend your time bitterly muttering to yourself in anger because your life didn't turn out as planned. During those times, you envision conversations you *think* you had with GOT posters, because thinking of clever responses to posts on GOT is one of the highlights of your sad day. What happens then is that you start to actually believe you and a given GOT poster had a conversation about a given topic that you imagined out of thin air even though this exchange never happened.

on page 102 - time 9.00 you posted "no matter what evidence you are faced with"

i replied at 9.16 "what evidence?" then continued answering with the "carbon trading" and "empty planes"

for some reason you have stated it was "another poster" i was talking to (as if that ever mattered)

i think "carbon trading" and "empty planes" are valid points to bring up when the general public are being told to limit their car journeys.

look it up on page 102 of this thread- you were the only poster i replied to were i first mentioned empty planes.

i have mentioned it since and have given the reason why.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top