We did have 76 minutes of the game with 11 men though mate.To be fair, a point in the first game of the season after going down to 10 against Palace isn't absolutely awful.
We controlled the game but were blunt in attack.How'd you play, guys?
Am I fool for having Richarlison in my fantasy side? That 8.0m could be redistributed elsewhere...
Yeah I think both points are valid.We did have 76 minutes of the game with 11 men though mate.
It's more about what lads say that I find funny (not in a piss taking out of them way) mate. Someone said the other day that if Gomes had still been on the pitch we would have won the game 1 - 0, I just pointed out that why weren't we winning the game 1 - 0 for the 45 mins Gomes did play.
You missed wolves at Home out which is the 4th game of season,while city is the 7th-we defo should go on an unbeaten run and get a few wins though,but this is EvertonI figured would Everton take 10 points in the first 6.
D at Palace
D at Villa
W v Watford
D at Bournemouth
W v Sheffield
D v City
I don’t think he meant it literally as much as he meant we should be taking advantage of the early fixtures and dominating the games we should win. 2 wins in that time frame isn’t good enough for what we want to achieve.Sure. Win 5 on the trot in the Premier League
This is the stuff that frustrates me the most...we rarely take advantage. Last season, when we went on that good run of results against sides in the top six, it meant feck all in the scheme of things. Immediate result=nice, net result=numberwang.My major concern is that our opening group of fixtures is very favourable on paper and we needed to come out of the traps all guns blazing to take advantage of that.