Definitely picked the wrong side, but the batting has been very poor.
It's always important to realise hindsight is never available about the future but you have to go on the evidence available without it.
I posted
'The only advantage to batting first is the insurance policy of the twilight zone which offers you a way straight back into the test if you get skittled in no time.
Wouldn't be surprised to see plenty of wickets from the off with runs hard to come by. Dusk (the twilight zone) just as the lights are coming on is usually when the ball hoops around, and batsmen well down the order start padding up even if there are several wickets to fall before they're due in.'
It really was always likely to be one were the toss hardly mattered, even the skipper's unsure. Kohli though pertinently said it's one were the lower order runs could be the major difference. Sundar was almost certainly included on the strength of his lower order batting rather than his rather more dubious claims as a spin bowler.
England meanwhile have tried to include as many number 11s as possible...
That's the big factor for me ... India know a couple of wickets and they're as good as all out, how is taking wickets so important then?
England seem to think bowl them out twice and it doesn't matter about us making any runs, or perhaps they were thinking we can rely on another double hundred from Joe to bail our poor selection out again.
Pope's a real talent but he needs to sort out some pretty major flaws if he's going to make the most of his ability. Take out the 3 games in South Africa this time last year and his average is actually pretty dire. Hope they can work on things quickly because it would be a massive waste if he falls by the wayside.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.