Cricket

Actually that is very impressive. They could, though, have lost this series through sloppiness.

Yeah, but it was a very good new Zealand one day team away from home tbf, same could be said for them not being too far away from another 4-1 win. Been a long tour of aus and new Zealand so it's good to see them ease to a win in a high pressure series decider .
 
Yeah, but it was a very good new Zealand one day team away from home tbf, same could be said for them not being too far away from another 4-1 win. Been a long tour of aus and new Zealand so it's good to see them ease to a win in a high pressure series decider .
I just can't get over England being 267/1 in the 38th over then stumbling to 335 off 50. I'll get over it if Everton get over the line.
 
The Aussies travails away from home continues ; Playing South Africa, in their second innings currently 180-5, 41 ahead. Seems to be a trait at the moment where the home country has the ascendancy.
 
Lancashire's Liam Livingstone, who is hoping to make his test debut against New Zealand, top scored with 88 in a warm up match.
 
Looks like Kevin Pietersen has retired. Would be fun seeing him as coach for England.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/43444692


Kevin Pietersen

_100463393_kphair_getty.jpg


Pietersen displayed the extrovert side of his nature throughout his England career, though his insecurity was often apparent too.

Great sporting careers don't always end in the style that has defined them. Bobby Moore played his final game of football for the Carolina Lightnin'. Andre Agassi lost his last match in tennis to world 112 Benjamin Becker.

You can read a little more into the fact that Kevin Pietersen appears to have waved goodbye to professional cricket after scoring seven runs for Quetta Gladiators in a six-wicket defeat by Islamabad United.

Banished from the England set-up four years ago, denied a valediction on the biggest stage even as he prepared to take revenge with a memoir as destructive as any of his best innings, Pietersen has been travelling the world with his Spartan KP Rhino bat in hand ever since, on the moneyed margins of the game and doing rather nicely out of it all the same.

At 37 he would hardly be cutting his career short. The lure of playing Peshawar Zalmi in Lahore may not have been enough to keep a young thruster interested, let alone a man who won four Ashes series and was once described as the most complete batsman in modern cricket.

Cricket is no longer his obsession. He has announced on social media that he intends to put his energies towards saving the endangered rhino, in which case a few odd-toed herbivorous ungulates can expect to be upstaged.

There were more reliable cricketers than Pietersen. There have been stars more liked by their team-mates and less susceptible to hubris. But few England players in the past 40 years have had the same electrifying effect on the game in this country, and few have dominated their stage in the same way.

Pietersen was different in temperament to the other two you might put on that brief list, Ian Botham and Andrew Flintoff. You always got the sense that he was admired rather than loved by England's support, his bristling confidence not leavened by the same self-deprecation as Flintoff nor his public pronunciations as no-nonsense 'white van man' as Botham's.

Like those two he made a poor England captain. Idiosyncratic genius works better set free rather than shackled by responsibility. Yet he was impossible to ignore when he came to the crease and he was unforgettable when he found his sweet groove.

Great players don't just score great innings. They change games and win matches.

That was what Pietersen did with his finest displays: the 158 against Australia at The Oval in that glorious late summer of 2005, his blistering 227 in Adelaide during the Ashes triumph of 2010-11, the 202 not out against India at Lord's in 2011 that helped make England the top-ranked team in Test cricket.

Pietersen could seem like the embodiment of the old cliche about cricket being an individual contest in a team game. Barring a change of heart, he will finish his career having played for 14 teams, including Sunfoil Dolphins, St Lucia Stars and Rising Pune Supergiant, which reflects his personality and its impact as much as the mercenary nature of modern global cricket.

Despite the English mother and the tattoo of the three lions on his left triceps, you were never quite sure where he belonged. Neither was he.

"There is a massive trust issue between me and Kevin," admitted Andrew Strauss, who had captained him in two of those Ashes wins, when he first took over as England's director of cricket in May 2015.

Strauss could have been speaking for several others whose task it was to manage a man once dubbed 'The Ego' by Australia's close-in sledgers. Sometimes it seems remarkable that he made it past 100 Tests for England, a maverick with the air of permanent impermanence.

He could be surprisingly insecure, a trait which could unfortunately present as arrogance. It was there in one of his most famous comments of all, during the home series against his native South Africa in 2012: "It's not easy being me in that dressing room."

It was all there in one of his retirement tweets on Saturday: "Just been told that I scored 30,000+ runs which included 152 [fifties]& 68 hundreds in my professional career. Time to move on."

His best captains understood what he was really like and allowed him to flourish as a result. There is a reason Michael Vaughan got the best out of him and a reason why Vaughan this weekend has described him as the best batsman he ever played with.

It's easy to say that Pietersen's divisive personality prevented him achieving more. It's harder to recall that he made more Test appearances than Wally Hammond, Ted Dexter and Peter May, ended with a higher Test average than David Gower, Geoff Boycott and Colin Cowdrey, and made more Test centuries than Graham Gooch, Len Hutton and Ken Barrington.

For all his swagger, for all the controversy that accompanied his eventual exclusion from the international set-up, England probably got as much out of them as they could. He may have preceded Strauss's decision not to recall him in 2015 by making 355 not out for Surrey, but he had averaged an underwhelming 34 in his previous 10 Tests, was a month shy of his 35th birthday and scored those spectacular runs against a county, Leicestershire, who hadn't won for two years.

And England should be grateful. Pietersen - the switch-hits, the skunk hair, the one-legged flicks through midwicket, the strolls down the wicket to startled fast bowlers - was like few who had come before and none who have come since.

_100464000_capture.jpg

Graeme Smith
Former South Africa captain Graeme Smith played with Pietersen at Surrey
_100460070_flintoff_tweet.jpg


Andrew Flintoff and Kevin Pietersen were part of the England team together
_100462081_capture.jpg

Michael Vaughan

_100460067_ecb_tweet.jpg

The official account for England's cricket team sent this message to Kevin Pietersen
 
I'm sitting at Eden Park right now, having a good laugh at how utterly [Poor language removed] the English are lol. Fair play though, the Barmy Army deserve a medal for supporting this lot
 
I got up at 5.30am to watch a few hours play before I went to work and thought Sky had made some kind of mistake when I turned on my telly and saw 'NZ 88/1 30 ahead'.

I didn't realise I'd just missed one of the most pathetic batting displays in the history of Test cricket.

I recall watching us being routed for 46 by West Indies but this was much worse for me. At least in 94 we were destroyed by one of the best fast bowlers of all time in Curtly Ambrose bowling one of the best spells by a fast bowler of all time. Boult and Southee, whilst good bowlers, certainly shouldn't be rolling Test teams over for that pitiful score.
 
cant actually believe how shoddy we were.

great bowling BUT no one was prepeared to dig in.

mentally all over the place.

utterly embarassing
 
I got up at 5.30am to watch a few hours play before I went to work and thought Sky had made some kind of mistake when I turned on my telly and saw 'NZ 88/1 30 ahead'.

I didn't realise I'd just missed one of the most pathetic batting displays in the history of Test cricket.

I recall watching us being routed for 46 by West Indies but this was much worse for me. At least in 94 we were destroyed by one of the best fast bowlers of all time in Curtly Ambrose bowling one of the best spells by a fast bowler of all time. Boult and Southee, whilst good bowlers, certainly shouldn't be rolling Test teams over for that pitiful score.

Constantly amazes me how coaches, and players, aren't better prepared at top-level competition. My youth cricketing standard was pretty modest, but even on a NZL school cricket trip to Aussie as a 17-year old, batsmen were told that the ball doesn't swing as much as what it often does in New Zealand conditions, so you can afford to sit on the crease a little. As bowlers, we were told that you can pull your length back a little, as the ball doesn't swing as much, but bounces more. Of course in NZL will the ball often swinging more due to more moisture and a little more grass on the pitch, as a batsman you need to get forward, cover for any possible movement.

How on earth do players like Root, Cook, Stokes not know then to not get caught on the crease on the first morning of a test match in New Zealand? Surely that's coaching 101 for guys who have been around as long as them.

I'd take issue with your statement that Boult and Southee are "good" bowlers. In the right conditions, a bit of movement in the air, as the English found out, they are world-class. And if you think Boult and Southeee are only good, the English must be pathetic to be rolled for 58 on a reasonable pitch.
 

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top