Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Had a relative test positive for COVID (non symptomatic so fine) today and I checked the government website to work out who needs to isolate. Apparently if you're double vaccinated you don't isolate unless you have symptoms or test positive? Surprised me that you can still go about your day if your partner has COVID.
 
Had a relative test positive for COVID (non symptomatic so fine) today and I checked the government website to work out who needs to isolate. Apparently if you're double vaccinated you don't isolate unless you have symptoms or test positive? Surprised me that you can still go about your day if your partner has COVID.
And the latest strain is massively contagious, best prey it doesn't make too many sick.
 
Need to see the full print but encouraging
Last week, another pre-clinical data showed that the drug had worked against key mutations of the Omicron variant. Sotrovimab is designed to latch on to the spike protein on the surface of the coronavirus, but Omicron has been found to have an unusually high number of mutations on that protein. read more

"These pre-clinical data demonstrate the potential for our monoclonal antibody to be effective against the latest variant, Omicron, plus all other variants of concern defined to date by the WHO," GSK Chief Scientific Officer Hal Barron said.
 
He was a patriot, travelling to protests and shooting people is a constitutional right I want preserved for my children and my children's children. This segues neatly with my belief that all public health advice is a hoax perpetrated by the government to control us

Why (like the media) are you misrepresenting the facts of the case?

Rittenhouse didn’t go to a protest and simply decide to shoot people but was playing cop guarding small businesses and his own community against rioters and organized criminals while the police themselves did not.

You can go and read the trial transcript or watch the trial yourself online. Rittenhouse was not guilty which is why he was found not guilty, though he probably wouldn’t have been found not guilty had there not been video (which I presume you have not watched?) evidence proving he was not guilty!

There are videos of one of the guys he shot pointing a gun (an illegal gun in his case) at Rittenhouse, and testimony of this man admitting this, this man himself a criminal with a long record like many of the rioters.

Why do you suppose Rittenhouse was found not guilty? Because the judge and entire jury were all also white supremacists (and I'm the conspiracy theorist)?

The entire case was a politicised witchhunt which were it not for the incident itself being caught on camera could have seen an innocent man sentenced to life in prison. And this for people like you would have been a good and righteous thing!

Why not actually back up your snarky comments with something substantial, say some actual evidence to support what you are saying?

Well because if the prosecution/media couldn't (despite their lies and resources) then I very much doubt that you can!
 
Last edited:
Why (like the media) are you misrepresenting the facts of the case?

Rittenhouse didn’t go to a protest and simply decide to shoot people but was playing cop guarding small businesses and his own community against rioters and organized criminals while the police themselves did not.

You can go and read the trial transcript or watch the trial yourself online. Rittenhouse was not guilty which is why he was found not guilty, though he probably wouldn’t have been found not guilty had there not been video (which I presume you have not watched?) evidence proving he was not guilty!

There are videos of one of the guys he shot pointing a gun (an illegal gun in his case) at Rittenhouse, and testimony of this man admitting this, this man himself a criminal with a long record like many of the rioters.

Why do you suppose Rittenhouse was found not guilty? Because the judge and entire jury were all also white supremacists (and I'm the conspiracy theorist)?

The entire case was a politicised witchhunt which were it not for the incident itself being caught on camera could have seen an innocent man sentenced to life in prison. And this for people like you would have been a good and righteous thing!

Why not actually back up your snarky comments with something substantial, say some actual evidence to support what you are saying?

Well because if the prosecution/media couldn't (despite their lies and resources) then I very much doubt that you can!



This is a covid thread mate, take your Rittenhouse screeds to the relevant thread where you will be more or less similarly ignored. Btw, is 8212 the number of previous banned usernames you have had?
 
This is a covid thread mate, take your Rittenhouse screeds to the relevant thread where you will be more or less similarly ignored. Btw, is 8212 the number of previous banned usernames you have had?

You brought up Rittenhouse in your last post and now when that's not working out so well and you are asked to back up your own mistruths suddenly it's off-topic!

And why wouldn't the Rittenhouse case have any relevance to COVID when everything most people know about COVID is coming through the filter of the mainstream media?

Isn't it important that we can trust the media, especially when it comes to vaccine mandates and lockdowns, etc.? Ah well, they bullsh*tted us about that one, and that one, and that one, but I'm sure we can trust them this time!

And why would I have been banned even once? I have expressed my opinions politely, whereas it is you, and others like you, whose one and only method of debating someone you disagree with is to try and ridicule or bully the person you are speaking to!

And please mate feel free to ignore me!
 
Just for clarity in case people don’t read the full article - it might mean there is an underestimate of spread of Omicron versus Delta but people will still know they have Covid and can isolate. Also only about 6% of Omicron genomes submitted to Gisaid database are BA.2 so, at least atm, it doesn’t seem like it will throw figures off too much.

“The variant is still detected as coronavirus by all the usual tests, and can be identified as the Omicron variant through genomic testing, but likely cases are not flagged up by routine PCR tests that give quicker results”
 
Just for clarity in case people don’t read the full article - it might mean there is an underestimate of spread of Omicron versus Delta but people will still know they have Covid and can isolate. Also only about 6% of Omicron genomes submitted to Gisaid database are BA.2 so, at least atm, it doesn’t seem like it will throw figures off too much.

“The variant is still detected as coronavirus by all the usual tests, and can be identified as the Omicron variant through genomic testing, but likely cases are not flagged up by routine PCR tests that give quicker results”
PCR tests have been proven to have false positive / negative results anyway. Or even results faked using fruit!

They aren't the most reliable to begin with. So eventually their limitations would come to light. As long as the proper tests still detect it then that's fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top