I’ve promised myself I wouldn’t engage with this but your only real point is doing my head in as it’s blinkered and ignores a really important component of the drivers of the recent rise in cases.
The study you are talking about said that vaccinated people *can* have similar viral loads as unvaccinated people. So it is possible that vaccinated people can be as infectious as vaccinated people. But that ignores one important point. That unvaccinated people are more likely to get this and therefore increase the number of infected people and so increase the likelihood of further infections.
View attachment 136967
Using the chart you posted.
The vaccinated cohort represents 32% of infections overall. That means that for the vaccinated cohort to be as responsible for further spread of the virus as the unvaccinated cohort (ie for the vaccinated cohort to be responsible for 50% of subsequent cases overall), vaccinated people would need to be at least 1.5 times more infectious than unvaccinated people.
Unvaccinated people are overwhelmingly responsible for the continued spread of this. That’s what the numbers you shared say.
You can hide behind viral loads all you like but it’s one factor. Ultimately, the more people have it, the more easily this can be spread. And vaccinated people are much less likely to get it as the numbers in the chart show.