Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks. Sorry didn't mean to upset you, it's just that you gave the impression you knew what you were talking about.

I do. There is no secret raygun free-energy weapon that brought down the towers. This is called "special pleading"...Wood takes a scenario that actually happened--the collapse of the WTC towers and other buildings--then invents some ridiculous scenario to account for their collapse--in her case a directed energy weapon--then when she is called out for being a lunatic and that there is no proof of such a weapon, she resorts to the ole "when you can't prove that it DOESN'T exist." This is a common tactic.
 
Bit loathe to put this in a conspiracy theories thread as this book is only based on facts. But essential for those who have been taken in by the official conspiracy theory of thermite etc



When you say "facts" you mean Judy Woods facts and the "specialists" she has in the video right?

Its easy for any expert or specialist to come up with there own theory and state it as facts. This video is full of conjecture, opinion and information given to the audience by well known conspiracy crackpots including a doctor who before she wrote the book has been discredited many times.

The word fact has been ruined by the modern age and used way too loosely.

Some of what she talks about is nonsense for example the cars. She seems to suggest because there is unburnt paper that the cars couldn't have been simply burnt by the fire embers from the building haha!! She obviously hasn't seen wildfires how embers travel and some things burn some things survive and well paper gets shifted in the wind as does anything when there is enough wind. She has no idea when that paper fell.

We all saw planes fly into the buildings. We know those people on that plane died and we know the people flying it were known to the FBI and had plotted something. There are easier ways or there would have been to kill a mass group of people in any city in the US and blame it on Bin Laden. To go through all of this trouble seems very irrational as does the idea of a super powerful ray gun.

What have these people got to gain from making crackpot theories out of a tragedy?

How bad an scenario she paints that she got mocked by the other conspiracy theorist 9/11 truth-er people. That's just low.
 
I do. There is no secret raygun free-energy weapon that brought down the towers. This is called "special pleading"...Wood takes a scenario that actually happened--the collapse of the WTC towers and other buildings--then invents some ridiculous scenario to account for their collapse--in her case a directed energy weapon--then when she is called out for being a lunatic and that there is no proof of such a weapon, she resorts to the ole "when you can't prove that it DOESN'T exist." This is a common tactic.

Without propping up the 'lunatic' element of this discussion, the US developed a 'sonic weapon' deployed at various embassies around the globe. Based on research from NASA that were dealing with whale song transmissions and content, they determined ultra low frequencies would cause convulsions in human beings, inducing nausea and vomiting instantly. They were developed to defend embassies from attack or being overrun without conventional weapons. It isnt a huge leap to expand the capabilities and the effect of sound on material has been known for millenia, it's how the pyramids were built and it's still usedby Tibetan mnks... ;)
 
Another conspiracy is brewing.

People who were shot but survived in Vegas are now being harassed by conspiracy-loons, calling the victims "actors", wishing them dead, etc.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/26/las-vegas-shooting-conspiracy-theories-social-media

These people have way too much time on their hands and need to do more with their lives than pretend everything has a deeper sicker meaning hatched by the government.

The internet has really fueled these idiots and given them a platform.
 
Without propping up the 'lunatic' element of this discussion, the US developed a 'sonic weapon' deployed at various embassies around the globe. Based on research from NASA that were dealing with whale song transmissions and content, they determined ultra low frequencies would cause convulsions in human beings, inducing nausea and vomiting instantly. They were developed to defend embassies from attack or being overrun without conventional weapons. It isnt a huge leap to expand the capabilities and the effect of sound on material has been known for millenia, it's how the pyramids were built and it's still usedby Tibetan mnks... ;)

I'm aware of a sonic weapon, probably not NASA research but DARPA. It can cause nausea, but not turn steel into dust, which is what Judy Wood claims. As to the part of your quote that I bolded, I'm not sure what you're getting at...low frequency transmissions built the pyramids?
 
Just read that las vegas shooter had a laptop with him in the hotel room. Now they are saying that laptop had no hard drive.

Read that and they think he removed beforehand. It's a bit odd they cannot find it though, unless he has hidden it well, or tossed it out the window or maybe the security guard and or the maintenance guy took it.

Odd really...
 
Read that and they think he removed beforehand. It's a bit odd they cannot find it though, unless he has hidden it well, or tossed it out the window or maybe the security guard and or the maintenance guy took it.

Odd really...
Why would anyone remove hard drive from their laptop and then that carry it around
 
Why would anyone remove hard drive from their laptop and then that carry it around

Not sure i mentioned he was. He obviously removed it, hid it or it was taken by someone else before the cops got there and we know two other people in the vicinity. All of this only if in fact this is the truth and there is a laptop without a HDD.
 
I do. There is no secret raygun free-energy weapon that brought down the towers. This is called "special pleading"...Wood takes a scenario that actually happened--the collapse of the WTC towers and other buildings--then invents some ridiculous scenario to account for their collapse--in her case a directed energy weapon--then when she is called out for being a lunatic and that there is no proof of such a weapon, she resorts to the ole "when you can't prove that it DOESN'T exist." This is a common tactic.

It can't be that common a tactic because I don't know what you're talking about. You seem to be arguing against something without having any knowledge on the subject.
The use of the words ray gun and being called out etc indicates you're repeating something you've heard about the subject without finding out yourself if the original argument is convincing to you or not. You've already admitted that yourself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top