Absolute genius!
How did you work that out, or was I being a bit thick?
Had it on the Speccy, only war game I could think of from that era. If it wasn't that, I wouldn't have had a clue haha
Absolute genius!
How did you work that out, or was I being a bit thick?
Had it on the Speccy, only war game I could think of from that era. If it wasn't that, I wouldn't have had a clue haha
Thanks for that,
I'll now be off to try and find a version to play, oh and also update wiki to negate this critique - A 1991 Computer Gaming World survey of strategy and war games gave it two and a half stars out of five, stating that it was "fun for a short time, but rapidly loses its interest appeal"
I mean Computer Gaming World doesn't even exist anymore, so what did they know? haha

I'll check those out, but found RD1 & 2 and (many) more here: https://archive.org/details/softwarelibrary_msdos_games![]()

Oh my god, I remember that! Quality game!Into The Eagle's Nest?
What are we thinking of this PS4PRO
What are we thinking of this PS4PRO
So is the pro for 4k tv and the VR? I'm not interested in the 4k tv but the VR is exciting
That's all they are doing it for. VR has caught them on the hop mid-generation.
The issue is that devs will just make games for the console that has the biggest possible consumer base, and that's the original PS4. The console industry is littered with high spec hardware that came out at the wrong time and couldn't compete with the likes of Nintendo in the SNES era or Sony in the PS1/PS2 era.
So all the new PS4 will do is play the games the original PS4 can, probably with no graphical difference, but with a few novelty VR titles which are no where the maturity required to be worthwhile yet.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.