- Status
Kev The Rat
Player Valuation: £70m
I've outlined my reasoning above
Professor Toffee
On and on, over the hill and the craic is good
Wow this thread has become a Monty Python sketch
Which makes no sense considering we always knew jags and stones was the first choice CB pairing,
Kev The Rat
Player Valuation: £70m
Why play Oviedo out of position ?
The Esk
Player Valuation: £70m
Great to see @Woolly Blue for a couple of pints COYBs
streeky
Player Valuation: £35m
who said I would replace besic for him, kev off cleverly on any day of the week.
But putting stones rb is playing him out of position? Oviedo is a natural full back stones isn't
toffeejack
Player Valuation: £100m
fair enough ... bobby's team is more exciting x
sageyefc
Player Valuation: £90m
Hes fine in that role, has the pace to keep up with their wingers aswell
Kankurette
Requested ban
Of course Lawro has predicted we'll lose. Of course. Berk.
SpurtingLesbian
Ken Dodd Nagasaki
Bobby obviously thinks is better to do that than play Stones not at CB and out of position
Decent line-up that. Defensive solidity must be a priority. Matic in attacking midfield role according to BBC Sport????? Need to get at them straight out of the blocks.
ftk43
Player Valuation: £8m
Somebody has to play out of position while Seamus is out. Oviedo or Stones - does it matter really? Stones is not that great of a Right-Back.
Jags
Player Valuation: £10m
I see your reasoning, but you assume that playing Stones at Right Back is more natural than Oviedo. I disagree. Not only has Oviedo more pace to get up and down the flank, but he is also more naturally a Full-Back and more two-footed. To me, the Byram deal is to have a TRUE Right-Back as cover. He's simply giving Mori a rest after a hectic start to Prem life. I think he wanted to ease him in, but this never happened due to Jags' injury.
- Status
