davek
Player Valuation: £150m
You say that when you support Starmer who's throwing out any Palestinians who turn up in the UK.
Changes Coming To GOT
- Thread starter GrandOldTeam
- Start date
- Status
You say that when you support Starmer who's throwing out any Palestinians who turn up in the UK.
I dont really think I support Starmer as such.
I voted for Labour sure, but Starmer is an MP, I dont really like any of them, self-serving bellends really, sure you get the odd good egg, but its a farce really isnt it?
So I wasnt expecting wholesale change, country is goosed, world is goosed, its all the same really.
Just gotta keep your head down and protect ya neck, keep your head on a swivel and try roll a 6 now and again.
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
Nar, still glad those Tory vermin didnt get in, you will see next time.All you needed to say was:
"You were right, Dave. And I was wrong."
When that lunatic they have in charge now is rounding everybody up.
As we are seeing in America, there is always a better option.
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
She'll be well dumped by then.
I'm half expecting Farage to step in, but it'll probably be Jenrick they turn back to.
They all sound lovely.
‘Kin page viewsPage views, shopping, it's all the same in the end.
I am chuffed to bits about the CA forum being closed.
I hate the fact that there's aggro that starts there, and then resolves in the Everton forum.
I hate the fact that there's aggro that starts there, and then resolves in the Everton forum.
CrustySack
Player Valuation: £0.99p
I tried to engage in conversation and healthy adult debate for the first time on the CA forum a few weeks back but was met with a wall of childish ridicule from a small fascist group for daring to have an opinion of my own, so no problem seeing the CA forum go.
Milk
Udderly delicious
@GrandOldTeam
I mod on another forum and the advice we have been given is that subforums such as CA/politics and threads such as Fit Birds (so long as within PG guidelines) are fine provided that they are only visible to registered members only
Closing both is a massive overreaction and not what OSA is aimed at
I mod on another forum and the advice we have been given is that subforums such as CA/politics and threads such as Fit Birds (so long as within PG guidelines) are fine provided that they are only visible to registered members only
Closing both is a massive overreaction and not what OSA is aimed at
That's not at all accurate.
That makes no difference at all regarding subsequent risk/moderation policy.
But laughing at the idea of "ah, make it login to view and it makes no difference"
If the other forum you help moderate is as big as this one, and then they choose to host an unmoderated politics forum then they're leaving themselves vulnerable.
I disagree.
As I've mentioned - both bring increased risk and dictate a moderation resource we don't have, nor want. We aren't moderating current affairs on a football forum. Unless we do that, we'd not be complying with UK law.
But thanks for the feedback.
Can the Current Affairs forum and the Fit Birds thread just be made visible to forum supporters? 
Can the Current Affairs forum and the Fit Birds thread just be made visible to forum supporters?
Age gating through payment method is effective/can be really helpful - sounds like allowances will be made/changes will happen but for now, we have to play it as it is.
So hang on if I call Goat a fat Nazi it gets the owner in trouble and could get the entire website shut down? Where’s the downsides in all this please.
- Status