Chang Extension

Status
Not open for further replies.
Has he used big boardroom buzzwords in his spin?
For those refuting my earlier comment about us being 8th in terms of the best sponsorship deal in the Premier League, this story on Sky Sports basically confirms what I said was true.

In fact it's so close to what I wrote to the point that I wonder if they saw my post!

http://www1.skysports.com/football/...-manchester-united-interest-in-seamus-coleman

Ok to put a different spin on it, Spurs renewed last year... £10m to £19m per year.
 
For those refuting my earlier comment about us being 8th in terms of the best sponsorship deal in the Premier League, this story on Sky Sports basically confirms what I said was true.

In fact it's so close to what I wrote to the point that I wonder if they saw my post!

http://www1.skysports.com/football/...-manchester-united-interest-in-seamus-coleman


"However, Martinez said the club's league finish - and whether they can secure European qualification - will have more of a bearing on his transfer plans...To be able to sign a new three-year deal is exciting for both parties but it doesn't change anything (on transfers)."

Hmm. So there we have it.
 
The upfront peice is key to this, the club like to have guaranteed income or rather the bank likes to know there is a definite revenue stream - we can give them to facilitate our borrowing.

Is what it is and we've never been anywhere else under the current board.

To put it into perspective it basically covers the interest we pay on most loans/debt.
 
Has he used big boardroom buzzwords in his spin?


Ok to put a different spin on it, Spurs renewed last year... £10m to £19m per year.

Exactly. Elstone has tied us down to a pitiful increase in annual revenue whilst our peers push ahead and drive deals befitting their status.

Everton are run on a hand to mouth existence. There is no forward planning other than to get enough cash off outsiders and from player trading that sees those parties they've run up debt with squared off with annual interest payments.

It's a knuckle dragging plan dreamt up by knuckle heads.
 

"However, Martinez said the club's league finish - and whether they can secure European qualification - will have more of a bearing on his transfer plans...To be able to sign a new three-year deal is exciting for both parties but it doesn't change anything (on transfers)."

Hmm. So there we have it.

It just keeps things ticking over till they sell.
 
The upfront peice is key to this, the club like to have guaranteed income or rather the bank likes to know there is a definite revenue stream - we can give them to facilitate our borrowing.

Is what it is and we've never been anywhere else under the current board.

This.
 
This deal is poor at best meh/average. I was hoping for 10 million but expecting 7 million and we got 5 !

As said Spurs signed a deal last year for 19 million. Newcastle get 6 million and Man Utd looking at a 53 million deal. So next year:-

Man Utd 53 million
Arsenal 30 million
Liverpool 20 million
Man City 20 million
Spurs 19 million
Chelsea 18 million
Newcastle 6 million
Everton 5 million

We would have to sell 2 Fellainis every year just to get back what Man Utd make on shirt sponsor alone ! Our sponsorship will be 10% of Man Utds. What ever way you look at it we are falling further behind.

On the playing side we extract everything we can from the money invested but the commercial side has yet again let down the entire club.
 

This deal is poor at best meh/average. I was hoping for 10 million but expecting 7 million and we got 5 !

As said Spurs signed a deal last year for 19 million. Newcastle get 6 million and Man Utd looking at a 53 million deal. So next year:-

Man Utd 53 million
Arsenal 30 million
Liverpool 20 million
Man City 20 million
Spurs 19 million
Chelsea 18 million
Newcastle 6 million
Everton 5 million

We would have to sell 2 Fellainis every year just to get back what Man Utd make on shirt sponsor alone ! Our sponsorship will be 10% of Man Utds. What ever way you look at it we are falling further behind.

On the playing side we extract everything we can from the money invested but the commercial side has yet again let down the entire club.

Negotiators know they're partners/potential partners inside out. Anyone in that game will know the cut of the regime they are dealing with: at Everton they know they're just happy to get a deal done and money in to keep the facade of a well balanced business intact. Sponsors start from a very strong position. Imagine you're Chang's negotiating team and you witnessed what went on with the shirt rights deal with Kitbag. You certainly wouldn't be thinking to yourself 'we better give a bit of slack here or we might lose our position as a sponsor of a top 6 club in the world's most marketable league'. You'd think that you held the whip hand and you could just drive through a minor incremental increase and know it'll be accepted and trumpeted as a great coup.

We are the PL best value for money partner...best value for others and not Everton.
 
As Martinez says this deal will have no impact on transfers. This is why we have to make up a team from loan deals.

Scary thing is the top 4 clubs could just decide to torpedo us, if City and Chelsea decided we were to much of a risk - what chance do we have of getting the Barry's and Lukaku's of this world. We've been relienent on the good will of other clubs for to long.

One bad year in the loan market and thats our whole policy in smoke. Our destiney is to relient on this strategy.

We're like the Crewe of the PL - which isnt or shouldnt be our mission statement.
 
Robert Elstone believes Everton's new £16m shirt-sponsorship extension with Chang can give the club a “competitive edge” on their Premier League rivals.

The Blues chief executive was in Bangkok today to sign the three-year deal, which is the most lucrative in the Goodison outfit's history, and said it will help Roberto Martinez's team to prosper while also building their fan-base in the significant Asian market.

Everton's decade-long partnership with the Thai beer firm is the longest-running shirt deal in the Premier League, and Elstone insisted that the sum it is set to generate will be an important part of the club's financial landscape.

Reflecting on the deal, which has risen by 33% (or £4m more than the previous agreement in 2010), he said: “It comprises a significant part of our annual turnover. It's the equivalent of the gross receipts of four Premier League games, so in that sense it's a large sum.

“As all fans know this year we're the beneficiaries of a phenomenal new television deal, and TV rights account for an ever increasing proportion of our income. In that sense, the main sponsor income is declining as a proportion but the big thing is it's revenue we control and can give us an edge over our rivals.

“While all clubs are getting the big TV cheque, not all clubs are getting sponsorship deals of this value so it gives us that little bit of competitive edge.

“If we get down to brass tacks it's a good deal for Everton. The values are right, and on Chang's part we deliver what they need which is profile, brand association and the world-wise exposure that comes with a deal like this.”

The agreement puts Everton in the top eight most valuable sponsorship agreements in the Premier League, said Elstone: “It's very difficult to get comparisons with the deals other clubs strike because the reported figures are very often inflated in my opinion.

“But our belief is that this stacks up very well and is the seventh or eighth most valuable deal in the Premier League.”

Potentially the sponsorship deal could be worth in excess of £16m, with additional payments based on the Toffees achieving certain specified targets in terms of league progress and silverware each year.

“Chang have always incentivised us on the pitch in every deal we've done with them, and they're achievable targets,” he said. “Over the term of the previous deals we've hit the targets and we're confident we'll hit them again.”

Elstone, who signed the contracts with Chang officials between the times of 12.19pm and 12.39pm in accordance with traditional Thai customs based on good luck, said the Blues had received other offers but chose to remain with a deal which offers the most mutual benefits.

“In a market place where there are probably more sellers than buyers in terms of sponsorships it's great that we can retain a very good partner,” he said.

“It's a deal we're comfortable with and it gives us a strong foothold in Asia which is an important market for us.

“It's also a testimony to how we consistently deliver for Chang and work hard to deliver their objectives. They're clearly happy with us. On their part we deliver what they need.

"While here we've met some of our Everton fan base and having a very credible brand on the front of our shirt brings important benefits in building that.

“In Chang's case it's a programme of work in Thailand we sustain and helps them make use of the sponsorship in their country; things like the Bangkok ThaiBev academy, the social and community work we do, and our help through some of the tragedies which have struck Thailand over the term of the partnership.”

Striker Arouna Kone was part of the group which travelled from Merseyside to celebrate the contract extension, and Elstone revealed that the first team squad could make a return to the South East Asian country for a high-profile friendly fixture over the next three years.

“We're delighted Arouna was here and grateful to him,” he said. “Chang have always been very keen for us to get first team players out here; he follows on from 2005 when the entire first team squad came out for a tour.

“Since then we've had Tony Hibbert and Marouane Fellaini and now Arouna. Chang love having them and they attract a lot of interest. Arouna has been a fantastic ambassador for the club.

“Chang are extremely keen to get the first team back out here for a tournament or a game and that's very much on our agenda over the next three years. We'd love to bring Roberto and his team over at some point. It would be fantastic for the Thai fans out here.”

http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/robert-elstone-says-16m-chang-6855339
 
So now we have the same deal as the teams in 10th, 18th and 20th place in the league!

Fun Fact: Sunderland and Fulham's COMBINED point total is lower than Everton's point total. But their shirt sponsorship deals are equal to ours and I am not allowed to find that a bit of a let-down apparently.

I realize the deals weren't signed when both teams were in relegation battles, and I also know there are likely tiers to a deal and they might get less if relegated and we might get more if we hit the CL lottery ... but honestly what evidence over the last 10 years would make Fulham (oh they're in London ... bollocks it's Fulham they aren't going to eat into Arsenal or Chelsea's market share FFS) or Sunderland as equally attractive a proposition to a fairly consistent top 7 side?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top