The question is how much of that is down to the set up though isn't it. I mean yes, there's no argument that under him, when we've tried to play an open game we've looked hopeless, but that isn't necessarily evidence that we can't possibly do it. Many of the same players did manage to play on the front foot under Silva for example. I appreciate that this means the hard of thinking will say I think Silva was a better manager, but hopefully you're not one of those.
It's also worth asking, how much is it the responsibility to make us better. That is partially the job of a coach to improve those things. I think everyone accepts it will take time, and in honesty the improvements in results and ruthlessness (you could call it game management or whatever) has got Ancelotti time, which overall most would say he deserves.
The question is going to be, how long does he get to make those changes/improvements? And how much more blood can squeeze from the stone of just being more clinical as a team.
My own view, is we can get int the top 6, and maybe the top 4 by squeezing the last few drops from what we are doing. But anything much after that will require a change of style, and if we want to be more consistent top 4 finishers it will need a bit more than what we are doing.
The key question is going to be, how far will adding another 3-4 starters each summer help that?
It's quite a nuanced discussion really.