App Icon

View in the GOT app.

A better way to browse. Learn more.

App Icon

Grand Old Team

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications.

Burnley Case

Wasn’t there a sum set aside in the sale that was retained from payment to Mosh incase of this, or am i imagining that?

Edit - not sure it was £40m mind….
Yes like a later post states you would imagine that Moshiri had to give an indemnity for any losses suffered by Everton during his period of ownership.

In simple terms this means that Moshiri rather than the current ownership have to pay the judgment ( if upheld on appeal).
 
We used the fella off the Simpsons
lionel-hutz-no-further-questions.gif

Lionel Hutz, attorney at law. (rip Phil Hartman).
 

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top