App Icon

View in the GOT app.

A better way to browse. Learn more.

App Icon

Grand Old Team

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications.

Burnley Case

Note that the interest payment is a ‘minimum of 9m’ meaning that if we appeal and drag it out then it continues to accrue
Alright. I saw the BBC mentioned 35m as a total sum.

*scribbles on pack of Embassy filters*

35m - 9m = 26 m

35m / 26m = 1.346

… or nearly 35% in interest that they are charging here?

The interest has been accruing roughly three years, right? So let’s calculate the annual rate, which would be the cubic root as it’s divided by three.

= ∛ 1.346
= 1.104

So they are charging us more than 10% pa interest on the principal?

‘Koff.
 
Details of our legal representation are coming out now, apparently Moyes thought he could sort this out on his own, telling the Friedkins ‘there’s nay Silk as super me, ye ken?’
Can’t this stain just leave the experts to do their jobs ffs? He loves a round peg in a square hole.

DD1A0FD8-8FC1-4F8A-8114-3B2779245492.webp
 
Alright. I saw the BBC mentioned 35m as a total sum.

*scribbles on pack of Embassy filters*

35m - 9m = 26 m

35m / 26m = 1.346

… or nearly 35% in interest that they are charging here?

The interest has been accruing roughly three years, right? So let’s calculate the annual rate, which would be the cubic root as it’s divided by three.

= ∛ 1.346
= 1.104

So they are charging us more than 10% pa interest on the principal?

‘Koff.
Yes 11.81% interest which continues to run so about 250k per month, and we appeal it then we are adding a 1/4 of a million per month to the bill until the next verdict
 
So to summarise the basis of appeal, Burnley had already been relegated BEFORE our accounting period ended, so we could have sold a player (or a women’s team) at any point before the 30th June and we wouldn’t have breached.

The fact we didn’t sell a player is weirdly irrelevant. The point is that at the time Burnley went down, we hadn’t yet breached anything. Any club could run the season way in excess of the PSR losses limit, then, for example, sell a striker on the last day of June. Perfectly allowed.

Makes a mockery of the whole “sporting advantage” nonsense. If you sell that striker on 30th June, you don’t breach and thus had no advantage via cheating. If you don’t sell the striker, you do breach and get sued for having a sporting advantage, when in both cases you had exactly the same squad throughout the entire season.

The beautiful game.
 

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top