Nordecke
Player Valuation: £35m
[video=youtube;u78TGnwFreY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u78TGnwFreY&feature=related[/video]
Great movie.
[video=youtube;u78TGnwFreY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u78TGnwFreY&feature=related[/video]
I love Michael Moore's works. So easy to dissect and refute. He really does make it easy:
http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html
Point number 6 addresses the statistics you quote above.
And yet refuted so unconvincingly. The point, it seems to me, remains...
i aint too savvy with the constitootion but doesnt it say `a right to bear arms`. you could say in england people with easy access to knives kill people. education my friend is whats needed in most cases
"Guns don't kill people - RAPPERS do."
i agree mate, guns are way freaky - i`ve got family in USA and no way will they have a gun coz of the `accidents` that can happen but for me theres no substitute for education and times have changed as you say but then you`re up against the nra who will obviously take the stance that guns dont kill people but ignore the fact that easy access to firearms is the major crux of the biscuit
I thought every American citizen carried a gun in their car glovebox.....no?
No one in the United States is talking about denying people the right to own hunting or sport rifles/shotguns. AK-47's? Would love to hear one actually cogent and logical reason why I should be allowed to traipse down to the local Gun Shop and pick up an AK-47 and 1,000 round of 9mm ammunition. The US was founded with a gun and no amount of discourse is going to cut that out of the national psyche.
I thought every American citizen carried a gun in their car glovebox.....no?
I thought every American citizen carried a gun in their car glovebox.....no?
The Constitution also counts non-whites as 3/5 a person for Census purposes and bars the forced quartering of soldiers in private person's home.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
To me, this reads: the public should not be denied arms as to allow the possibility of a well regulated militia to rebel against the tyranny of the government as needed. Not the right to own an assault rifle.
No one in the United States is talking about denying people the right to own hunting or sport rifles/shotguns. AK-47's? Would love to hear one actually cogent and logical reason why I should be allowed to traipse down to the local Gun Shop and pick up an AK-47 and 1,000 round of 9mm ammunition.
The US was founded with a gun and no amount of discourse is going to cut that out of the national psyche.
Fully automatic weapons are illegal in the U.S. So thus an AK-47 is illegal unless modified to semi-auto.
Fully automatic weapons are illegal in the U.S. So thus an AK-47 is illegal unless modified to semi-auto.