Last time I checked scoring more goals than the opposition was still the way to win football matches. In the past 36 hours you have now stated that a good first touch, goals and assists are all overrated. All in support of the idea that a lad with a poor first touch, no assists and one goal in 15 league appearances is a creative colossus. If, as you say, goals and assists are "low (you actually said now but I assume this was a typo) level stats" what stats should we use to judge an attacking player? You clearly loathe Bernard but adore Iwobi, you claim this is because of their relative contribution to the team (or at the very least their potential for future contributions) but offer no evidence other than your own, clearly biased opinions - which, given you don't think controlling a football, creating goals or scoring them are important characteristics, are of a very "low level" - to support this argument. How are we supposed to take you seriously?