Andrew

What is the problem?
The problem is that British people still support a feudalistic system. We still seem to think that because of your birthright, or financial situation that somehow you deserve to be put on a pedestal. We have a system where because of who your father or mother was you have to sign all legislation that passes through our democratic system. Indeed we have an upper house of unelected privileged people. The wealth of the country is concentrated in the hands of the few to the exclusion of the many. The trickle down economy is based upon those with obscene amounts of money sharing it out amongst those without. We live in the most unequal society where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer and we still elect the same type of people with generally the same type of policies over and over again.
 
The problem is that British people still support a feudalistic system. We still seem to think that because of your birthright, or financial situation that somehow you deserve to be put on a pedestal. We have a system where because of who your father or mother was you have to sign all legislation that passes through our democratic system. Indeed we have an upper house of unelected privileged people. The wealth of the country is concentrated in the hands of the few to the exclusion of the many. The trickle down economy is based upon those with obscene amounts of money sharing it out amongst those without. We live in the most unequal society where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer and we still elect the same type of people with generally the same type of policies over and over again.

I see the fundamental issue of wealth disparity is good vs evil.

For example, wealthy people can hire expensive lawyers and screw the working class every single time with no consequence.
 
As this has hit a tangent, Mangione got his own back, and good for him.

Gone quiet on mandelson and mountbatts for now. Who tipped Hoyle off in the BVI's re mandelson? He couldn't pish off out there anyway could he as it's still british jurisdiction?
 
I see the fundamental issue of wealth disparity is good vs evil.

For example, wealthy people can hire expensive lawyers and screw the working class every single time with no consequence.
It not only applies to the Law, it also applies to health, education and opportunities in life. 6/7% of British people have been through the private education sector but 80% of Prime Ministers have been come from that system. It is ridiculous that ordinary people vote for the people they do. Democracy is a great system on paper but its greatest strength is also its greatest weakness in that everyone gets a vote.
 

  • Joichi Ito: After a disgraced exit from American tech and media circles, Ito, who had deep ties to Epstein, secured a second act in Japan with the help of powerful allies in the Japanese government.

Seems jeffrey had mandelsons in other governments and financial and legal institutions.

In the main article, what springs out is the follow up from the FBI when specifically requested. Because it didn't happen. Oh, that and deciding to bring charges, an initial investigation that got switched off for no reason, then restarted, expanded, and went cold. Then he died. Since then all his pals he was still going out for dinner with have all proclaimed their innocence and suggested falsely they'd cut ties with him.

Who has the power to make the prison guards fall asleep at the same time, switch the security cameras off, decide not to investigate all the bank accounts, over rule immigration and flight logging rules and control the FBI?

The perfect storm, impossible consecutive failures, the concurrent continuous miracles that just so happened to fall in a way that has totally isolated epstein from those paying him to fix things for them is the stuff of fantasy.
 
So, just sticking to Andrew, although it applies to the USA as well:

Given the relative luxury of the circles that these people moved in, there must have been hundreds, if not thousands, of normal people, sweeping the floors, cleaning the rooms, cooking meals, driving cars, flying and crewing planes, etc., etc.

Given what we now know from the files, why do they not contain any interviews with these employees (easy enough to find from tax and social security filings) about what they experienced during that employment?
 
So, just sticking to Andrew, although it applies to the USA as well:

Given the relative luxury of the circles that these people moved in, there must have been hundreds, if not thousands, of normal people, sweeping the floors, cleaning the rooms, cooking meals, driving cars, flying and crewing planes, etc., etc.

Given what we now know from the files, why do they not contain any interviews with these employees (easy enough to find from tax and social security filings) about what they experienced during that employment?
Possibly wrapped up in NDA's or even preemptively paid off to have seen nothing. Also we don't know what threats have been made against them and their families if any at all.

Edit: To add, "excuse me mr pilot/madam hair dresser/the local plumber... how come you're coughing up now two decades late?".

faac950fcba0b1f32733321929d55f83.jpg
 

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top