dholliday
deconstructed rep
ok...so?
Current Affairs Afghanistan
- Thread starter Del-boy
- Start date
- Status
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
so its a highly dubious link (as FWIW is your latest crap from the "Academy of Ideas", btw)
dholliday
deconstructed rep
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
is that meant to refute my point that the Washington Examiner is very dubious?
dholliday
deconstructed rep
Yes, because i can also link Washington Times reporting the same thing:
Trump would beat Biden in 2020 election do-over, new poll shows
U.S. voters may be experiencing buyer’s remorse when it comes to President Biden, according to a newly released poll.
www.washingtontimes.com
Your reflexive ad-hominem bias towards the other is preventing you from understanding certain viewpoints.
And seen as you mentioned it (well, dismissed it) this sort of thing is one of the key themes of that Mass Psychosis/Academy of Ideas thread.
Yes, because i can also link Washington Times reporting the same thing:
Trump would beat Biden in 2020 election do-over, new poll shows
U.S. voters may be experiencing buyer’s remorse when it comes to President Biden, according to a newly released poll.
Your reflexive ad-hominem bias towards the other is preventing you from understanding certain viewpoints.
And seen as you mentioned it (well, dismissed it) this sort of thing is one of the key themes of that Mass Psychosis/Academy of Ideas thread.
Are you on commission for that video, as you’ve mentioned it 50 times in multiple threads in addition to its own thread?
dholliday
deconstructed rep
it's the main story arc rippling through each episode (thread).
You didn’t answer the question.
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
Yes, because i can also link Washington Times reporting the same thing:
Trump would beat Biden in 2020 election do-over, new poll shows
U.S. voters may be experiencing buyer’s remorse when it comes to President Biden, according to a newly released poll.
Your reflexive ad-hominem bias towards the other is preventing you from understanding certain viewpoints.
And seen as you mentioned it (well, dismissed it) this sort of thing is one of the key themes of that Mass Psychosis/Academy of Ideas thread.
I wasn't calling the Washington Examiner highly dubious just because of that article, you know.
Also my "reflexive ad-hominem bias" is based on (sadly) long experience of watching you post rubbish on this forum, with this video being just the latest example.
That said, this time it is really funny to watch you simultaneously rave about a video like that whilst also continuing with the pro-Trump stuff. Perhaps you should see if they do a video on cognitive dissonance?
dholliday
deconstructed rep
Do you also call the Washington Times dubious? The argument is Trump would win vs Biden if the election happens now. Your refutation is that one online source that reported on it (amongst many others) is one you don't like.
The others that reported on it you presumably like better, but your focus remains on the one publication you don't like, rather than the actual argument at hand.
Hence your place in the debate-pantheon being quite low-rank, at least for this conversation:
This video which has ignited learned debate online these last 2 weeks, providing a voice to many of us who sense something is currently very wrong with the nature of debate.
I don't think you understand this term.
Have you even watched the video?
Do you also call the Washington Times dubious? The argument is Trump would win vs Biden if the election happens now. Your refutation is that one online source that reported on it (amongst many others) is one you don't like.
The others that reported on it you presumably like better, but your focus remains on the one publication you don't like, rather than the actual argument at hand.
Hence your place in the debate-pantheon being quite low-rank, at least for this conversation:
This video which has ignited learned debate online these last 2 weeks, providing a voice to many of us who sense something is currently very wrong with the nature of debate.
I don't think you understand this term.
Have you even watched the video?
I mean, this is quite funny.
D
Deleted member 48881
Guest
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
Do you also call the Washington Times dubious? The argument is Trump would win vs Biden if the election happens now. Your refutation is that one online source that reported on it (amongst many others) is one you don't like.
The others that reported on it you presumably like better, but your focus remains on the one publication you don't like, rather than the actual argument at hand.
Hence your place in the debate-pantheon being quite low-rank, at least for this conversation:
This video which has ignited learned debate online these last 2 weeks, providing a voice to many of us who sense something is currently very wrong with the nature of debate.
I don't think you understand this term.
Have you even watched the video?
I have watched it - have you? I ask because again it’s really hard to see how someone can rave about it (and presumably agree with what it says about how totalitarianism functions) whilst also continuing to praise / defend Trump and cite with approval the Washington Examiner.
Judging by the many ignored poster posts I can see I’m guessing you’re all falling into the trap of getting involved with that wum holliday… hopefully he gets upset again soon and disappears… best thing all round for everyone.
If only this guy was still in charge there would be no problems with the withdrawal of the troops.
- Status