I do appreciate the your points.
But I also disagree.
City won the league playing the best football they could afford , they didn’t cheat on the pitch and that is where football is played .
They also develop players through their academy like other clubs.
Financial advantage is something that reoccurs throughout the history of the game.
We had it in the 60’s under JM and were disliked for it , but in that period we produced some of the finest football teams I have ever seen.
The purity you seek has never existed .
The most successful clubs have always had a financial advantage , success breeds success .
When we were ahead of United in titles and they couldn’t buy a success, they paid the best wages by far because of their inherent financial advantage.
Clubs who have sustained success accumulate financial advantage along with it .
This alone warps the idea of a level playing field .
The idea of attempting to limit financial advantage , pursued by the authorities, while good in principal has merely had the effect of ring fencing the successful clubs , it is an artificial restraint that has failed and was always doomed to failure in hindsight.
Punishing clubs because they want to spend money is ridiculous.
Pool all money
Distribute equally
Limit squad sizes
Cap wages
Limit academy players
Put all this in place and you have the level playing field you desire.
Without these measures, we just have to accept it’s a warped sport and just enjoy the spectacle it provides , and pray Everton get lucky .
Or find a modern day equivalent of Brian Clough , the only manager who beat the financial big players consistently with Derby and Forest respectively.
Again mate, you are trying to justify it, by seeing at as extension of something that always been, I’m saying it’s not and given my reasons.
None of the teams you try to tangent with went from nothing to something that quick, nor had been found guilty of cheating by European football authorities twice and are facing 115 by domestic authorities - these are all concurrent facts.
I’m curious why as to why you legitimise what City do? Hie tly not having a go, just don’t know anyone can think what City do is fair, has integrity or is based on merit?