No chat that I'm aware of - I wish I was!
All I can figure out from reading the report is that EFC must have recorded a loss of at least £40m in FY22-23.
After add-backs were added on, EFC lost £55m in 19-21 (averaged out), £10m in 21-22, so that equates to £65m over those two years, so essentially there was a £40m margin to play with for 22-23.
It sounds like a lot, especially since we made efforts on the playing side, but the USM/Megafon sponsorship of FF/Goodison/the women's team was supposedly (according to someone at the club) 'around £20m' - though that same person then told someone else it was closer to £30m!
I think they'll almost certainly look to use the USM/Megafon stuff as mitigation in this case. They only used the stadium naming rights deal in the 21-22 case, and I suspect that's because the money for the other sponsorships (FF etc) had been paid up front at the start of the year, so it was already accounted for by the time the sponsorship was suspended in March 2022. But, that's me guessing, and I have no idea if that would even be successful.
I fully expect another deduction, which is why results like yesterday are even more frustrating. But we'll see - perhaps we only are over by a few mil. But if that was the case I actually don't know if the PL would have called it in given all the hassle with the first charge.