6 + 2 Point Deductions

They can't do that...it will be far too obvious. If one charge is 10 points, city with 115 will have to be at the very least 115 points...one point for every charge...and even if they manage to get reduced to let say 80 charges, it will still probably be 80 points you would think meaning dead certain to be relegated.
It's widely being put out by the press & football pundits that City's charges are totally different from Evertons & will take at least 2 years to come to a conclusion.
Evertons is arbitrary and only apply to Everton.

Softening it up already ?
 

It's widely being put out by the press & football pundits that City's charges are totally different from Evertons & will take at least 2 years to come to a conclusion.
Evertons is arbitrary and only apply to Everton.

Softening it up already ?
Yes, they’re accused of intentionally breaking the rules.

We’re charged with bad accounting and poor excuses to mitigate it.
 
They've made this up as they've gone along and have painted themselves in so many corners its unbelievable.

But as theyre judge And jury they wangle themselves out of their own impasses - So the original punishment will stand - to show that they weren't wrong in the first place.

They will then try to claw back some positive PR by...tempering justice with mercy or some such bubbles...and suspend 5pts

Because they're vindictive they'll hope we step over the line with our next set of accounts
...which  Is possible.
Then hit us with another 10 plus the suspended 5.
 
Not 100% on that. The rules say we can’t go to court but as far I know you can’t completely contract out of the laws of the land - putting “you can’t sue us” in a contract doesn’t necessarily make it so. If there is something procedural- and abuse of process is an issue here- it could still end up in court.
exactly, isnt that how the Bosman ruling developed after a court case challenged the legal status of the rules?
 
exactly, isnt that how the Bosman ruling developed after a court case challenged the legal status of the rules?
I think the football authorities realised the error of their ways after things like Bisman and wrote into the rules that you cant take anything to court or CAS. They want to make sure that there is no method of appeal outside their own crooked and rigged system.
 

I think the football authorities realised the error of their ways after things like Bisman and wrote into the rules that you cant take anything to court or CAS. They want to make sure that there is no method of appeal outside their own crooked and rigged system.
the point is that they can write it into the rules of the competitions but uf they contravene the laws of the land, such as effecting a restraint of trade (by stopping a business owner putting their own money into their own business perhaps), then they can lodge a tort in a civil court and there isnt a lot the FA/EPL can do about it
 
It's widely being put out by the press & football pundits that City's charges are totally different from Evertons & will take at least 2 years to come to a conclusion.
Evertons is arbitrary and only apply to Everton.

Softening it up already ?
City charges are not too dissimilar if not actually worse...over inflated sponsorship deals to ensure they meet the financial regulations...without those crazy commercial deals they got, especially at the start of everything, they wouldn't have been able to build the squad they have today.
 

Top