But long term we are unlikely to play a 3
I'm not saying what I think Carlo will do (god only knows what mad genius is in store) but more intuitively 3 cbs makes sense, not only bc there's a strength of depth few other teams have, but also it could be the solution to competitiveness and winning titles.
Its not really a back 3. It can very quickly change to a 4 or 5 minute to minute or match to match while at the same time building a stable way of playing amongst all the changing.
The flaws of teams like the RS are being exposed. Carlo showed that with Seasmus on Robertson, and he did it without really changing the system.
I generally hate 3 or 5 at back as its been but there seems to be something different emerging here.
If they get in a right player who can play rb and as a midfielder rather than just a winger, the potential and dynamics in attack are better while still keeping it very stable at back. Its a solid defensive 32 through the middle with Digne and R given the lateral responsibility while have the opportunity to attack - one in a different role to the other. Its better than the RS style 23 anyways.
We really talking about using a diff species of CB too. And reckon 3 is better than 2 .