carolinablue232
Player Valuation: £70m
What is wrong with you?Harris & Buttigieg, the bruised knees ticket.
What is wrong with you?Harris & Buttigieg, the bruised knees ticket.
it's so predictable.Harris & Buttigieg, the bruised knees ticket.
it's so predictable.
Lets call Michelle Obama big Mike.
Lets taunt Harris about sexual acts.
Republicans are basically pre pubescent 12 year olds.
Nothing wrong with pointing out the farcical nature of running on this ticket. Tbh it was meant as more of a dig at Harris than Buttigieg. However, I know exactly why Buttigieg's name was put forward here. It was also a slight dig at why Buttigieg was named. It's whatever minority Dems can pander to. That's what got Dems their current Harris problem in the first place. Next time it's the Buttigieg problem.What is wrong with you?
Why though why just bring everything immediately to women are sluts , chuck around homophobia or whatever . If you think they’re socialists , I definitely don’t , stick to that or hit whatever policies you don’t like . Just seems cheap and nasty to be honest .Nothing wrong with pointing out the farcical nature of running on this ticket. Tbh it was meant as more of a dig at Harris than Buttigieg. However, I know exactly why Buttigieg's name was put forward here. It was also a slight dig at why Buttigieg was named. It's whatever minority Dems can pander to. That's what got Dems their current Harris problem in the first place. Next time it's the Buttigieg problem.
It’s pathetic but seems to be popular, strange worldit's so predictable.
Lets call Michelle Obama big Mike.
Lets taunt Harris about sexual acts.
Republicans are basically pre pubescent 12 year olds.
I’m not a Dem and I’d vote for Pete. He’s a high intellect individual who has demonstrated his aptitude.Nothing wrong with pointing out the farcical nature of running on this ticket. Tbh it was meant as more of a dig at Harris than Buttigieg. However, I know exactly why Buttigieg's name was put forward here. It was also a slight dig at why Buttigieg was named. It's whatever minority Dems can pander to. That's what got Dems their current Harris problem in the first place. Next time it's the Buttigieg problem.
Not the first time, won’t be the last.Why though why just bring everything immediately to women are sluts , chuck around homophobia or whatever .
You weren't the one I was responding to. I responded to someone who suggested the Harris/Buttigieg ticket. That because Vance was on the Republican ticket then Buttigieg should be on the Dem ticket. Your opinions on Buttigieg are of little interest to me.I’m not a Dem and I’d vote for Pete. He’s a high intellect individual who has demonstrated his aptitude.
You defaulting to sexual orientation based jokes is at best immature. Grow up kid.
How about an independent with a brain parasite?We get either a doddery old man or a rapist felon nonce who may possibly be one of the worst humans on earth. Who to choose???
I suggested Pete as a running mate because they both have a military background and Pete would wipe the floor with Vance in a debate.You weren't the one I was responding to. I responded to someone who suggested the Harris/Buttigieg ticket. That because Vance was on the Republican ticket then Buttigieg should be on the Dem ticket. Your opinions on Buttigieg are of little interest to me.
We are supposed to embrace DEI yet we aren't meant to point to any individual who is employed in a role because of DEI. Strange.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.