£20 m. to spend on one player

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn't really say he's a striker, I know he plays there, but I'd say he's more of a goalscoring no.10, that's where he playes now isn't it, behind Rossi?

Couldn't really say, Rossi's only had one game. He's obviously a boss player but we BADLY need a striker who just scores goals ATM.
 

bernard_brasil_rodolfobuhrer_ae.jpg
 
This, realistically speaking. Top player and only going to get better, could go on to be one of the best no.9s in world football. If only we'd had the foresight to sign him, he only cost Villa 2m more than we paid for Jon Stones

I would say Benteke. To be fair though, Villa paid 9 million for him, (money that was never made available to the manager) which is significantly more than the 2 million or so we paid down for Stones.
Failing that someone like Eriksen would be an excellent buy.

Overall though, I have to be honest and say I am not in favour of paying 20 million for players. We can't really afford to do that.
 
16 goals in 36 games this season having played in midfield half the time and not being the team's main attacking focus. Finished him.

All very nice, I still dont think he was the player he was.

Also hes a prick. Stay away from him, he had his chance.
 
Rooney had similar 'finished' shouts after his poor performance in the 2010 World Cup. He scored 27 league goals the season before last, more than RVP or Suarez could manage last season. I don't agree that RVP is better than him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top