Recent content by LostBrummie

Walsh did ok for us yesterday, Arry played him at number 10 in a 4231 which from what I've read on here is probably a bit high up for him. He certainly got stuck in, and there was a few spells of quick passing around their box he was central to. He certainly looks like a footballer...

Will do, I get to prob 75% of games home and away and he sounds like exactly what we were missing so I definitely expect him to get a run, if not for the first couple as there will be some bigger names he will need to displace (though the bigger names aren't very good so won't take much, Craig...

Cheers, I guess I thought he might be combative considering the players we'd gone for before getting him, and also the title of this blog :) - https://harrydunford.wordpress.com/2016/02/05/liam-walsh-is-hard-as-fk/ But yeah a later life Paul Scholes is probably exactly what we were missing if...

Hi all, Birmingham fan here in peace. On the comment about Walsh not playing enough, we signed him after failing to get 4 combative ball playing midfielders in a row, the latest failure being Alex Song, so if Walsh is good enough he will be starting for us. I guess my question to you lot is...