We'll see.It's already happening in the insurance industry - if companies have a chance to fight legal challanges for loss of earnings they all will
We'll see.It's already happening in the insurance industry - if companies have a chance to fight legal challanges for loss of earnings they all will
They can sue but there is no guarantee they will win, even if they do the insurance companies simply will not be able to pay and will file for bankruptcy... these are unprecedented times. Anything that happened before will count for nothing here.
Assuming it is void, what do they have to appeal? Poor us, we didn't get our trophy?
I think all grounds for such will be on loss of revenue; Liverpool wouldn't have a case, it's just bad luck
My entire point here is based on the premise that Greed and revenue will prevail ahead of the right ethical or moral thing to do
The issue is as well, it's much harder to prove there;s a loss if income from it. The PL could hand them the biggest slice of the pie in terms of TV revenues and really, financially they have done their obligations. It's not for courts to start intervening and go giving trophies to people who haven't earned them.
So I can claim back my sky subscription from August?Yes that makes sense, but the above works off the assumption that the TV revenues still exist in an uncompleted season. All reporting suggests that unless the season is completed, these revenues are gone
Yes that makes sense, but the above works off the assumption that the TV revenues still exist in an uncompleted season. All reporting suggests that unless the season is completed, these revenues are gone
Well it's my understanding that they are withholding the last payment, and they have paid for 3/4 and are happy to honour that. If that remains the case, losing 1/4 of the revenue this season is better than losing 1/2 or potentially 1 whole of next seasons.
My understanding is different & perhaps kited by journalists with interest in the season being completed, but I thought it was a simple case of no full season, the contract is not completed and TV companies will be contesting the full spend on year.
Yes, it is paid in installments, but from what I have read it seems to be fairly clear that there would be one hell of a fight over the full years fees if it doesnt get completed.
It's already happening in the insurance industry - if companies have a chance to fight legal challanges for loss of earnings they all will
Voiding won't happen so i see the league being played in august although the pandemic won't be over it should have subsided significantlly to allow matches behind closed doors in the uk, but i think the players mental and physical state will determine if this is possible
There won't be time to start in August and complete next season. There is also going to be the difficulties of players being able to be registered.
At some point the first domino will fall, IE a league will be cancelled and voided. Once that happens, they will all fall into line.
Every statement being ushered currently is merely damage limitation for when the litigation commences. Essentially "it's not our fault, we wanted to play but it was taken out of our hands".
I am not sure I totally agree with you.Couldn't agree more & at the end of the day, it might well end up void and as mentioned; in the grand scheme of things it's only football and it doesnt really matter at the moment, but my two points....
1) Still can't see 20/21 starting until 19/20 outcome is clear - they co-exist
2) If 19/20 is voided, there will be legal challenges, which will be far far slower than completing the season, which is why I think ultimately they will complete, even if football isn't back for 12 months from now.