Do UEFA prosecute under British law, not sure what that point was.
But anyway, I would imagine City Lawyers would be all over this.
If City have broken rules they should be banned, but not if there's UEFA skullduggery going on regarding evidence or those rules.
That was my point really.
I was suggesting that even in UK, there can be a bias in the legal process, but the law has to be followed, regardless of the bias. My only reason to cite British Law (no such thing actually)
You implied that they were being banned to protect the "chosen few", which is probably the truth, but not the reason given. Any legal challenge can only be done on the basis of the rule that was enforced. For example if you go and batter Klopp, you get done for assault and battery, there is no excuse that he is RS and deserved it.
UEFA must be pretty sure they are legally water tight on the evidence that led to the ban, otherwise they are extremely foolish. They may be the most gobshite ridden bunch of cheating drooling eejits, but if they have evidence of rule breaking they are entitled to ban clubs from entering their own tournaments and/or paying a fine that they impose. To expose themselves to legal challenge on the substance of the case would be huge folly, knowing the financial might of the accused party.