New shirt sponsors

Who would you like to see sponsor us next?

  • USM

    Votes: 65 13.2%
  • MEGAFON

    Votes: 64 13.0%
  • NEC

    Votes: 66 13.4%
  • AMAZON

    Votes: 9 1.8%
  • APPLE

    Votes: 17 3.4%
  • NEA

    Votes: 4 0.8%
  • DAIRYLEA

    Votes: 13 2.6%
  • DAVEK

    Votes: 55 11.1%
  • GOT

    Votes: 12 2.4%
  • THE ONE WHO PAYS THE MOST

    Votes: 189 38.3%

  • Total voters
    494
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m all for the good old retro NEC shouts with our overload and saviour’s MegaFon plastered all the way down the sleeves
 
got be these for me, nappies would come in handy for some of our fans
78450287-A74B-4B7A-9620-35212EEB7520.jpeg
 


I'd rather not have anything USM-related on the shirt.

It would just mean that we are becoming lazy in sourcing outside sponsorship at a time when we have to be much more effective in generating revenue organically and provide legroom for FFP.

Abramovich has never gone along with providing direct or indirect sponsorship at Chelsea if I'm correct, though he has done wih Russian clubs in the same sort of way USM now do with us.

Clearly we are not attractive and/or prominent enough to attract real "brand" sponsorship as I think in that market, the companies are bold enough to make the first move and not wait to be asked.

I would just like to have a sponsor with at least some brand recognition and/or quality and reputation.

But it wouldn't be difficult to improve on Sports Pesa, I do hope a gambling sponsorship ban is enforced in the near future.

I thought it was very interesting to read recently that BP, despite making overtures, couldn't find clubs to sponsor. I'm not sure in what countries/sports markets, but I found that remarkable. There may be questions regarding sustainability and climate change that would raise eyebrows, but I would have no problem whatsoever with BP on the shirt.
 
I'd rather not have anything USM-related on the shirt.

It would just mean that we are becoming lazy in sourcing outside sponsorship at a time when we have to be much more effective in generating revenue organically and provide legroom for FFP.

Abramovich has never gone along with providing direct or indirect sponsorship at Chelsea if I'm correct, though he has done wih Russian clubs in the same sort of way USM now do with us.

Clearly we are not attractive and/or prominent enough to attract real "brand" sponsorship as I think in that market, the companies are bold enough to make the first move and not wait to be asked.

I would just like to have a sponsor with at least some brand recognition and/or quality and reputation.

But it wouldn't be difficult to improve on Sports Pesa, I do hope a gambling sponsorship ban is enforced in the near future.

I thought it was very interesting to read recently that BP, despite making overtures, couldn't find clubs to sponsor. I'm not sure in what countries/sports markets, but I found that remarkable. There may be questions regarding sustainability and climate change that would raise eyebrows, but I would have no problem whatsoever with BP on the shirt.
That's the bit they will flounder on
 
It's a bit crazy really. There's a thread elsewhere about the 'big six' and that it's silly, yet each of those clubs commands £40 million per year for their shirt sponsor. Taking Sunderland aside, no other club gets more than £10 million per year.

It's the same with kit deals, with those six clubs earning at least 5x what Everton earn per year for their kit deals.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top