Utterly pointless. All it does is give every other bloody club a chance to poach him.
Either sign him or don't! If the loan has a permanent fee clause included, fair enough, but if it doesn't and we'd have to start discussions at the end of teh loan deal... absolutely pointless.
No but we'd surely have first dibs on him to sign him after the loan. If we re-read the statement from SP carefully, it doesn't mention that he's been sold, and just states that he's <currently> under contract til 2013, but that allows for a loan-followed-by-a-first-dibs interpretation - it's what the statement doesn't say that's interesting.
Otherwise, agree it's pointless...









