Never you mind.
I was right though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Never you mind.
Think there's more than one of them .Everyone’s a bit triggered by an obvious red. Easily ignored.
Anyway, you’d hope Usmanov would turn up at some point. I’d expect that he’s been around in some way already.
As far as I know he has options to buy the rest of the shares at an agreed priceDoesnt work quite like that.
Moshiri has said he has no wish to buy out small shareholders but I suppose that could change. He would have to deal with individuals who probably do not wish to sell. Only when and if he reaches 90% does he have any legal right or obligation to buy them.As far as I know he has options to buy the rest of the shares at an agreed price
NOMoshiri has said he has no wish to buy out small shareholders but I suppose that could change. He would have to deal with individuals who probably do not wish to sell. Only when and if he reaches 90% does he have any legal right or obligation to buy them.
No what ?
He sold up after the UK were looking into seizing the oligarchs assets.
It's no fluke usmanov sold his stake after this and Chelsea is for sale at the right price.
Roman Abramovich & Alisher Usmanov Could Lose Chelsea & Arsenal Stakes Amid Growing Russia Trouble
Trouble Majority shareholders of two of England's biggest clubs may face losing their prize assets, with relations between Russian and English leaders...www.90min.com
My view on this, and it has been for some time that Usmanov is likely invovled in the background (a view now widely corroborated) and that he will probably not come into the light as it were.
For whatever reason (and there are plenty) he wants to be in the background. This is not uncommon for how he operates more broadly in business. It may well be his son (stepson) gets involved at some point which would be a positive.
I am not sure holding a standard that he is the public face as being the only evidence really works anymore. Using the lack of this as evidence he's not here, again I would say is below par. Managers do not go and meet Usmanov (as Allardyce has said he did, as did Brands)if he has no involvement.
This is not uncommon either, even in England. It happened with Spurs currently, or Palace that the face of the organisation is different to the real power base. It's common across Russia. We've also had a similar arrangement with Kenwright and Green before this.
The good news is, it's unlikely we will ever want for funds, but as clubs are finding FFP is beign really tightened so we need to be sensible with it.
Only when and if he reaches 90% does he have any legal right or obligation to buy them.
I haven't got them to hand, though it was fairly widely reported both noted meeting at his residence in London.Where are these quotes from Samuel and Marcel?
My view on this, and it has been for some time that Usmanov is likely invovled in the background (a view now widely corroborated) and that he will probably not come into the light as it were.
For whatever reason (and there are plenty) he wants to be in the background. This is not uncommon for how he operates more broadly in business. It may well be his son (stepson) gets involved at some point which would be a positive.
I am not sure holding a standard that he is the public face as being the only evidence really works anymore. Using the lack of this as evidence he's not here, again I would say is below par. Managers do not go and meet Usmanov (as Allardyce has said he did, as did Brands)if he has no involvement.
This is not uncommon either, even in England. It happened with Spurs currently, or Palace that the face of the organisation is different to the real power base. It's common across Russia. We've also had a similar arrangement with Kenwright and Green before this.
The good news is, it's unlikely we will ever want for funds, but as clubs are finding FFP is beign really tightened so we need to be sensible with it.