Not sure if the transfer failings were down to Walsh or Koeman or both because I don't know what goes on behind closed doors. I'm also not really sure what Walsh does day to day in his DoF role, whether its negotiating deals or scouting. I think there has been a clash of now and buying for the future with no signs of working together. Do we think Koeman was employed to make us compete quickly for top 4 whilst Unsworth develops his coaching and Walsh brings in the future stars for Unsworth? Looking at it now I can't see why we employed Koeman. We should have went for a long term manager willing to work alongside the youth set up. Complete clash of expectations between them all.
In terms of transfers I'd guess that Schneiderlin, Klassen, Gylfi, Williams and to a point Rooney are Koeman signings and Giroud being a Koeman target, that's a significant amount of money spent there and all for the 'now'. For all we know Walsh could have given Koeman a long list of young potential forwards but Koeman wanted quick success so ignored them for a Giroud or Costa because he was in a hurry. The signings I think that are down to Walsh and Unsworth working together are Lookman, Gueye, Mathis, Adeniran, DCL, Pickford, Foulds, Gibson, Markelo, Donkor etc. Some of them are already showing a lot of potential and could be brilliant in the future so we probably won't see the benefits until 2 or 3 seasons. I don't think we should sack Walsh at all but just adjust his role because I think he has a great eye for young players and will work well with Unsworth if he gets the job.