Nail on head in many areas though
No, but that will always be the case. Bottom line, you can spend billions but with the wrong manager you can still not reach where you want to do. How managers did City plough through to win 1 trophy - 3?
And getting top 4? Maybe not. Competing? Yes. Moyes did it. Martinez did it once. Not one of them spent what Koeman has.
You compete until someone drops the ball and you capitalise. Leicester did it. Spurs did it when United, RS and Arsenal were in flux. None of them have out spent the big 4.
Koeman comes across like he could spend and spend but still not progress to being a winner because of how negative and egotistical he is.
Nail on head in many areas though
A large part of the piece focuses on letting lukaku go without finding a replacement. It refers to spending too much time trying to get the Sig deal over the line. It also refers to having no plan b in respect of giroud.It's not though.
It's eradicating the fact that Koeman said throughout the summer that if we wanted to compete at the very top we needed at least a striker in.
Without that player our top four chances have taken a serious hit.
Yes, the tactics in the last few games haven't been up to scratch and Koeman will know that.
But not getting a striker is a huge oversight on the board's part. For whatever reason, it doesn't matter. We had enough time to get a huge list of 'replacements' for Rom and to not get one in is ridiculous.
No, but that will always be the case. Bottom line, you can spend billions but with the wrong manager you can still not reach where you want to do. How managers did City plough through to win 1 trophy - 3?
And getting top 4? Maybe not. Competing? Yes. Moyes did it. Martinez did it once. Not one of them spent what Koeman has.
You compete until someone drops the ball and you capitalise. Leicester did it. Spurs did it when United, RS and Arsenal were in flux. None of them have out spent the big 4.
Koeman comes across like he could spend and spend but still not progress to being a winner because of how negative and egotistical he is.
It's not though.
It's eradicating the fact that Koeman said throughout the summer that if we wanted to compete at the very top we needed at least a striker in.
Without that player our top four chances have taken a serious hit.
Yes, the tactics in the last few games haven't been up to scratch and Koeman will know that.
But not getting a striker is a huge oversight on the board's part. For whatever reason, it doesn't matter. We had enough time to get a huge list of 'replacements' for Rom and to not get one in is ridiculous.
A large part of the piece focuses on letting lukaku go without finding a replacement. It refers to spending too much time trying to get the Sig deal over the line. It also refers to having no plan b in respect of giroud.
Obviously not getting a striker is massive Toff, saying that though, and it's actually quite worrying, we're not creating hardly any chances what's so ever in games, even without an out and out striker we should be creating way more chances than we are, our shots on target stats ( even shots off target ) is absolutely woeful.
Another thing that baffles me is mate, in the Summer you would imagine Koeman sat down and said to himself "This is how I want to play, and these are the type of players I need" then for some reason done a list of players where most of them are too similar, and as we've now seen, Koeman is trying to shoe horn these players in all over the gaff.
Sorry but I don’t get that we should be getting top 4 because we spent a lot.
Did the big teams not already have multi million pound squads? Did most of them not spend loads in the summer too? Did they lose all their expensive players and me not realise?
We purely played a little bit of catch up. And will still be playing it for a good while yet.
If you watched Koeman's presser yesterday, he explained it.
In fact, I think his 'closing statement' on it was:
'If there's one person who has ambition in football, [it's me]. But I am also realistic. And sometimes being realistic is difficult'
I do think Koeman has an idea of how he wants to play mate, but it's just not clicking as of yet.
The worry is he hasn't yet figured out a plan B.
That being said, we haven't had the bets of games to try that out either, especially with so many new players.
So in the next three games we have to get the results and start to gel/formulate a few alternative ways of playing.