I'm on episode 4 and I'm starting to not care whether he is guilty or not. Blatantly dragged out as a money spinner!! This should be 3 episodes tops...and would be bog standard on a documentary channel....I'm suprised people have gone daft about it.
I'm on episode 4 and I'm starting to not care whether he is guilty or not. Blatantly dragged out as a money spinner!! This should be 3 episodes tops...and would be bog standard on a documentary channel....I'm suprised people have gone daft about it.
Falsely imprisoned for 18 years and then upon his release he is charged with murder and is pursued by many of those people responsible for his false imprisonment...
Whichever way you look at it, it's a pretty fascinating case, I'm surprised you don't care whether he's innocent or guilty.
As for it being dragged out, I think it makes a nice change not to have 30 years summarised in an hour or so. On the contrary, been this series will no doubt miss many important factors.
I'm on episode 4 and I'm starting to not care whether he is guilty or not. Blatantly dragged out as a money spinner!! This should be 3 episodes tops...and would be bog standard on a documentary channel....I'm suprised people have gone daft about it.
Why wasn't much made about Teresa Halbach's voicemail(?) getting used by her ex and brother, with both of them guessing her password just like that? It seemed suspicious at the time, but nothing else was said.
This after all was filmed nearly 10 years ago ( where i am up to) and is edited to whatever the Directors point of view is. It is designed in the hope that people make a decision as to Guilty or not!! but as with my family member has decided they know what happened to Madeline Mccann based on the information they were fed from the interent...how can you ever know you have all the facts?