Making a Murderer Documentary on Netflix

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm on episode 4 and I'm starting to not care whether he is guilty or not. Blatantly dragged out as a money spinner!! This should be 3 episodes tops...and would be bog standard on a documentary channel....I'm suprised people have gone daft about it.
 

I'm on episode 4 and I'm starting to not care whether he is guilty or not. Blatantly dragged out as a money spinner!! This should be 3 episodes tops...and would be bog standard on a documentary channel....I'm suprised people have gone daft about it.


Yes, yes! I mean, how much could possibly be said about a case that has gone on for 30 years!?
 
Just watched episode 5. Gripping stuff.

steven%20avery%20defense%20team%20making%20a%20murderer%20netflix.png


Yes the boys.
 
I'm on episode 4 and I'm starting to not care whether he is guilty or not. Blatantly dragged out as a money spinner!! This should be 3 episodes tops...and would be bog standard on a documentary channel....I'm suprised people have gone daft about it.

Falsely imprisoned for 18 years and then upon his release he is charged with murder and is pursued by many of those people responsible for his false imprisonment...

Whichever way you look at it, it's a pretty fascinating case, I'm surprised you don't care whether he's innocent or guilty.

As for it being dragged out, I think it makes a nice change not to have 30 years summarised in an hour or so. On the contrary, been this series will no doubt miss many important factors.
 

Just finished it, I thought it was excellent. What happens to Brendan Dassey is just completely disgusting. Ken Kratz is one horrible specimen
 
Falsely imprisoned for 18 years and then upon his release he is charged with murder and is pursued by many of those people responsible for his false imprisonment...

Whichever way you look at it, it's a pretty fascinating case, I'm surprised you don't care whether he's innocent or guilty.

As for it being dragged out, I think it makes a nice change not to have 30 years summarised in an hour or so. On the contrary, been this series will no doubt miss many important factors.

well reasoned argument , maybe i was quick to dismiss. Id struggled to get into as i do think its very much like any documentary you would see on a documentary channel. That said i am kind of getting into more from the end of the 4th episode and will carry on.

Having a family member who actually laps up and is prepared to believe every conspiracy theory going from Madeline McCanns parents to Sandy Hook School shooting to Twin Towers being brought down by the American Government. I do tend not just accept what im being told.

This after all was filmed nearly 10 years ago ( where i am up to) and is edited to whatever the Directors point of view is. It is designed in the hope that people make a decision as to Guilty or not!! but as with my family member has decided they know what happened to Madeline Mccann based on the information they were fed from the interent...how can you ever know you have all the facts?

Of course this is making Netflix money - they want viewers
 
I'm on episode 4 and I'm starting to not care whether he is guilty or not. Blatantly dragged out as a money spinner!! This should be 3 episodes tops...and would be bog standard on a documentary channel....I'm suprised people have gone daft about it.

amazing post

lol
 

Why wasn't much made about Teresa Halbach's voicemail(?) getting used by her ex and brother, with both of them guessing her password just like that? It seemed suspicious at the time, but nothing else was said.
She seemed a right whopper on those videos so wouldn't be surprised if it was the ex (because of the aforementioned and she was getting pumped by that Scott fella) or even the sinister looking brother.
 
This after all was filmed nearly 10 years ago ( where i am up to) and is edited to whatever the Directors point of view is. It is designed in the hope that people make a decision as to Guilty or not!! but as with my family member has decided they know what happened to Madeline Mccann based on the information they were fed from the interent...how can you ever know you have all the facts?

Yes, it does have the feel of being heavily edited on the side of Avery and I do wonder if we sometimes miss vital facts in favour of the prosecution.

However, it's strength lies in the fact that it is all primary footage and audio, and so it does enable the viewer to base their beliefs on what happened, as opposed to a narrator retelling the story with a unique spin.
 
Watched it last week, thought it was compelling stuff. Crazy to think he could be innocently locked away twice in his lifetime.

Can't trust anything Colburn or Lenk say, they're proper dodgy.

They stitched his nephew up big time as well, feel more sorry for him.

The ex and brother of Theresa seem like proper snakes too, thought his lawyers presented a brilliant case.
 
I'm on episode 6, I find it curious that anyone involved with the prosecution or law enforcement are either made to look incompetent or corrupt......they can't all be!!
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top