Tim Howard

[Coffee and TV]

He's corrected that stat now

Still awful

 

[Gwladys St. Glory]

Like I was gonna' be arsed to research it...handling napalm for any length of time is unwise, you just spray and pray.

 

[mlyons]

Guessing the bloke is counting anytime we have conceded when up in a game etc, as in Sland scored 2 when we were up in the game, stats can say whatever ya want them to if you look hard enough though.

That's wrong, too. Howard's definitely made saves when we had a lead -- two against Southampton, one against Chelsea, three against Sunderland, three against Aston Villa.

Sure, stats can definitely say whatever you want them to if you just make them up without actually bothering to see if they're accurate.

 

[mlyons]

He's corrected that stat now

Still awful

And still not accurate.

 

[bluestevon]

That's wrong, too. Howard's definitely made saves when we had a lead -- two against Southampton, one against Chelsea, three against Sunderland, three against Aston Villa.

Sure, stats can definitely say whatever you want them to if you just make them up without actually bothering to see if they're accurate.

Don't see why some people are so obsessed with trying to fake stats to make Howard look worse than he is, anyone with eyes can see he isn't very good anymore and costs us goals and points and needs to be replaced soon - at least in my opinion.

 

[Dithering Dougie]

He's corrected that stat now

Still awful

All or any really any credibility has been lost by that 'stats expert'

What a tosser desperate to get his wrong point across.

 

[Prevenger17]

He's corrected that stat now

Still awful

Sportofact would have done some research.

 

[Dithering Dougie]

That's wrong, too. Howard's definitely made saves when we had a lead -- two against Southampton, one against Chelsea, three against Sunderland, three against Aston Villa.

Sure, stats can definitely say whatever you want them to if you just make them up without actually bothering to see if they're accurate.

The guess a desperate tosser looking for gullible follwers on Twitter, some will lap it up like idiots. Others like yourself will see straight through it.

 

[Dithering Dougie]

Sportofact would have done some research.

Haha he's got less rep than that Irish beut..

 

[Coffee and TV]

And still not accurate.

Yeah, seems like we've done it 4 times, not 7. Explains why Sky come up with crap incorrect stats all the time though.

 

[Dithering Dougie]

Yeah, seems like we've done it 4 times, not 7. Explains why Sky come up with crap incorrect stats all the time though.

Som people lap it up because it Howard though...

 

[MikeH72]

EH HOWARD IZ DED GUD LADZ LOLZ USA USA USA

 

[TheOldLady]

Anyone got a bin big enough for the utter joke

 

[maccavennie]

Can't be doing with Howard myself like but that was a great fingertip save imo and was just unlucky between him and Ross that it wasn't cleared.

Blame goes to the 3 tits standing at the back who can't be arsed jumping ( 2 of the 3 which are our centre backs I think ).

Great corner but at least challenge the man ffs

 

[Smudge1985]

Yet again doesnt move his feet, he doesnt dive so much as fall sideways. He's an utter liability.

Today ironically showed up more than any other just how much Martinez completely refusal to drop Howard is costing us. We were up against Norwich who have dropped their long term reliable old keeper for an inexperienced kid, and despite him not having any real saves to make, he has commanded his area and been decisive. He has made 3 brave saves at the feet of Kone and Barry, that Howard will never make because his feet are glued to his goalline. Yes the defence has its problems too, but our biggest problem is getting rid of a total liability of a goalkeeper who does nothing but induce sheer panic in the back four and give them double the work to do.